School & Classroom

An investigation of the influence of student behavior on teacher behavior.

Sherman et al. (1974) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1974
★ The Verdict

When students act better, teachers act nicer—no staff training needed.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping teachers who feel stuck with hard classes.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working in one-to-one therapy rooms.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Two disruptive students were taught to stay on task and keep quiet.

The researchers never told the teacher what they were doing.

They simply watched if better student behavior changed how the teacher acted.

02

What they found

When the students behaved, the teacher smiled more and scolded less.

She also made more friendly comments to those two kids.

The change happened without anyone coaching her.

03

How this fits with other research

Jones et al. (1977) took the idea further. They taught a student to hand out praise to teachers. The teachers then gave more praise back.

Hall et al. (1971) did the opposite. They trained teachers to ignore disruption and praise work. Student problems dropped.

Thompson et al. (1974) flips the arrow: fix the kids first, and teacher warmth follows naturally.

04

Why it matters

You can soften a tough classroom by starting with the students. Cut disruption with brief practice, timers, or token boards. The teacher may start smiling more without extra training. Try it during one reading group and watch the vibe shift.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick the two most disruptive students, teach them a quiet-hand rule, and tally teacher praise before and after.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multiple baseline across behaviors
Sample size
3
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The relationship between student behavior change and teacher reactions to the change was investigated. One fifth-grade teacher served as the subject and two students in her class were employed as teacher change agents. In a multiple baseline design, the students' disruptive behavior (the independent variable) was modified without the teacher's knowledge. The teacher's reactions toward the students (the dependent variable) was monitored on several dimensions including: teacher behavior, teacher attitude toward students, and the quality of teacher verbal statements. Results indicated that student behavior change influenced the teacher's behavior. Implications are that students possess potent reinforcing properties for teachers and that students should be trained to be effective students.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-11