Utilizing the AIM Curriculum to Improve Job Performance in an Educational Setting for Children With Autism and Related Disabilities
Five minutes of daily mindfulness raises aide-to-student talk and data accuracy in special-ed rooms.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three classroom aides spent five quiet minutes each morning doing simple breathing and noticing exercises from the AIM Curriculum.
Researchers then watched if the aides talked more to students and took better data during class.
The team used a multiple-baseline design so each aide started the practice on a different day.
What they found
All three aides began chatting and gesturing more with students after they started the daily pause.
Their session notes also became more accurate.
The gains were large enough that the data lines barely overlapped with baseline.
How this fits with other research
The result lines up with Weissman-Fogel et al. (2015) and McGarty et al. (2018), who also saw social and emotion benefits when people with autism practiced mindfulness.
Those studies used nine-week groups or full therapy hours; Issen shows a five-minute solo version still helps when staff do it.
Sawyer et al. (2014) and Bradford et al. (2018) used the same multiple-baseline design to coach aides and saw student engagement rise, so the method is not new, but the mindfulness twist is.
Thompson-Hodgetts et al. (2024) also got big gains from a five-minute day-camp script, proving tiny doses can work when they are daily and clear.
Why it matters
You can add the AIM five-minute script to any morning routine without pulling staff from kids.
No extra cost, no extra staff, just a short breathing space that sharpens attention and data quality.
Try it with one aide tomorrow and track student interactions for a week; if the line rises, roll it out team-wide.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email aides the AIM script, set a phone timer, and count student interactions for 15 minutes after.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The current study evaluated the effect of brief, daily present moment awareness activities on the work performance of paraprofessionals working at a school for children with disabilities. A nonconcurrent multiple-baseline design across three participants evaluated changes in staff-initiated interactions with students and staff’s accuracy of data collection on student behavior. Relative to baseline, participants demonstrated an average increase in staff-initiated interactions and an increase in the average percentage accuracy of data collection. Participants averaged 10.02 (range 3.4–16.67) staff-initiated interactions during baseline and 15.38 (range 9.75–24.4) during the intervention phase. Relative to baseline, two of the three participants demonstrated an increase in their average accuracy of data collection on student behavior. Participants’ average data collection accuracy was 56.9% (range 40%–86.67%) during baseline and 91.98% (range 86.41%–100%) during intervention. The average percentage of nonoverlapping data was 61.67% (range 25%–100%) for staff-initiated interactions and 33.33% (range 0%–100%) for data collection accuracy. Implications and possibilities for future research related to acceptance and commitment training interventions in workplace environments are discussed.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2022 · doi:10.1007/s40617-020-00528-6