Practitioner Development

Towards a Modern-Day Teaching Machine: The Synthesis of Programmed Instruction and Online Education

Root et al. (2020) · The Psychological Record 2020
★ The Verdict

Skinner’s frame-by-frame teaching machine still works when you paste it into today’s online modules.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who teach online CEU courses or university classes.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct client interventions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Root and team built online college modules that act like Skinner’s 1950s teaching machines.

Each screen gives a tiny bit of text, asks a quiz question, and shows the answer right away.

The case series tracked how the students used the modules in two ABA courses.

02

What they found

Students kept clicking through the mini-lessons and scored high on the built-in quizzes.

Discussion-board posts also rose, but the paper gives no group comparison or effect size.

03

How this fits with other research

Two years earlier Malkin et al. (2018) ran a quasi-experiment and proved that forced online discussion lifts quiz scores. Root keeps the discussion piece and adds rapid-feedback frames, so the 2020 work extends the 2018 finding.

Alba et al. (1972) showed that college kids only attend lectures when points are tied to showing up. Root moves that same contingency idea onto a screen, trading lecture seats for clickable frames.

Repp et al. (1987) warned that pure operant drills can feel stale. Root answers by wrapping the drills in modern web design, showing the tactic can evolve instead of being shelved.

04

Why it matters

You can copy the teaching-machine format in your own online CEU modules or supervisee trainings. Break content into one-sentence frames, insert a question, reveal the answer instantly, and award points for each click. The quick payoff keeps learners moving and can boost both quiz scores and forum talk without extra class time.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Split your next online lesson into 5-frame chunks with instant quiz feedback after each frame.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case series
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The 21st century has seen rapid enrollment in online courses and environmental and biological determinates, such as COVID-19, that challenge how universities respond to education. However, this “new way of doing things” has empirical support from the past. Skinner (1968) laid out a science of teaching derived from operant conditioning principles and provided methods for adopting programmed instruction into what he termed a “teaching machine.” This series of investigations evaluated the validity of programmed instruction in online courses, as measured by quiz performance, the frequency of discussion posts, instructor time commitment, generalization, and student perceptions of the online modalities used. Results are discussed for the synthesis of programmed instruction and group learning towards a modern teaching machine.

The Psychological Record, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s40732-020-00415-0