The implementation of postgraduate training programs through state and local resources.
State and local coffers can still bankroll your staff training—just bolt on modern fidelity checks shown in later studies.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Timberlake et al. (1987) mapped how states and towns can pay for ABA training after college.
They toured New York and Missouri programs that used public disability funds.
The paper lists who to call, what forms to file, and how to keep classes running year after year.
What they found
The authors did not run an experiment.
They simply wrote a how-to guide for directors who want free or low-cost staff training.
No test scores or skill gains are reported.
How this fits with other research
Xenitidis et al. (2010) later tested a short PowerPoint course for new staff.
Knowledge scores rose after the workshop, showing the 1987 idea can work in real life.
Leaf (2025) now says most postgraduate training is still too weak.
That paper urges tighter exams and live supervision—an update, not a clash, with the 1987 funding plan.
Griffith et al. (2020) cut costs further.
They gave undergrads a self-study packet plus group feedback and hit mastery on trial-based FAs.
Together the chain reads: find money (1987), prove brief courses work (2010), trim dollars with self-instruction (2020), then raise quality checks (2025).
Why it matters
If you direct services, treat this paper as a grant cheat sheet.
Use it to locate state disability dollars, university centers, or Medicaid waivers that can pay for your next RBT or BCBA cohort.
Pair the money roadmap with later studies that add short workshops, self-instruction, and fidelity checks.
You get staff who are both funded and skilled.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Call your state developmental disabilities council and ask for the UAP training grant packet mentioned in the paper.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A profile of implementation strategies for funding postgraduate training programs using local or state resources is described. The need for those implementation strategies as well as basic principles for successful implementation is documented. Two programs are briefly described--a University Affiliated Program (UAP) in western New York and a UAP in Missouri--as the basis for generating implementation strategies. Finally a discussion is provided reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1987 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90027-8