The effects of modelling on the contingent praise of mental retardation counsellors.
A five-minute live model can jump-start staff praise, but have feedback ready for anyone who needs a second push.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Five counselors watched a five-minute live demo. The model praised adults with intellectual disability while they brushed their teeth.
Researchers then counted how often each counselor gave praise during the same tooth-brushing routine. They used a multiple-baseline design to be sure any jump was caused by the demo.
What they found
Four of the five counselors started praising right away. Their praise stayed high when they later helped clients with a different hygiene task.
The boost lasted at least two weeks with no extra training.
How this fits with other research
Moss et al. (2009) looked at 55 staff-training studies. They found the biggest gains come from mixing lecture and on-the-job coaching. Dodd et al. (1977) is one of the early proofs that a tiny slice of coaching—just watching a model—can work.
Blackman et al. (2022) seems to disagree. They showed that most trainees need direct feedback, not just observation. The gap is about risk: modeling alone can spark change, but you can’t bank on it for every staff member. Plan to add feedback if praise rates stall.
Yaw et al. (2014) kept the modeling-plus-feedback recipe but shifted the target from praise to data accuracy. Staff again reached mastery fast, showing the combo works across skills.
Why it matters
You can lift staff praise in five minutes. Show a clip or demo in the morning huddle, then measure praise during the next session. If someone doesn’t budge, layer on brief verbal feedback. This low-cost move raises client reinforcement immediately and keeps working for weeks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open your next team meeting with a 5-minute praise demo, then track each staff member’s praise for the next client session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A multiple-baseline design was used to evaluate the effects of a simple modelling procedure on the contingent praise of five counsellors while they conducted hygiene-training sessions in toothbrushing and hand-and-face washing with severely retarded children. After varying numbers of baseline sessions, each counsellor watched a model who conducted a series of toothbrushing sessions, in which he conspicuously praised correct toothbrushing responses and approximations to correct responses. No modelling occurred during hand-and-face washing sessions. As a result of several exposures to the model's performance, levels of response-contingent praise provided by four of the five counsellors during toothbrushing sessions increased sharply over baseline. The levels of counsellor praise showed parallel increases during hand-and-face washing sessions. A two-week followup showed that the levels of praise obtained through modelling were maintained in the model's absence.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-75