Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks.
College textbooks still smear behaviorism—know the myths so you can correct them on the spot.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors opened 40 college psychology textbooks. They looked for every page that talked about behaviorism. They graded how well the books explained radical behaviorism.
They checked four hot topics: animal work, environment-only talk, language, and real-world use. They counted errors, half-truths, and missing facts.
What they found
Most books got behaviorism wrong. They painted it as cold, rat-only, and anti-thought. They skipped Skinner’s later work on thinking and culture.
The errors showed up in intro books and in advanced texts. One book even said behaviorists deny genes. None of the books linked behaviorism to today’s ABA clinics.
How this fits with other research
Critchfield (2014) gives you ten rules for fixing these myths when you talk to teachers or parents. The 1983 paper showed the mess; the 2014 paper hands you the broom.
Fernandez et al. (2023) found that BCBAs also drift from textbook token-economy specs. So the trouble isn’t just in psych 101—it seeps into our own rooms.
King et al. (2020) add that even our journals rely on quick, story-style reviews. Weak reviews keep weak ideas alive, just like weak textbooks do.
Why it matters
Wrong textbook stories become wrong public stories. When teachers think we ignore the mind, they fight our plans. When parents think we train kids like rats, they drop services. Read the paper, spot the myths, and use Critchfield (2014)’s rules to set the record straight. Your next IEP meeting will run smoother if you do.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Pick one myth from the paper and write a one-sentence comeback you can use in your next meeting.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Behavior analysts have recently expressed concern about what appear to be misrepresentations of behaviorism in psychology textbooks. This paper presents an analysis of currently used textbooks in the areas of introductory, social, cognitive, personality, and developmental psychology that confirms this. Topics on which behavior analysis is most often misrepresented relate to the role of animal learning research, environmentalism, the "empty organism," language, and the overall utility of the approach. Because textbooks are often a major medium of interaction between the public and behaviorism, behavior analysts must work to correct these errors and to prevent possible negative consequences of widespread misunderstanding. Several potential solutions to these problems are presented that take into account current publishing practices and the monetary contingencies which support them.
The Behavior analyst, 1983 · doi:10.1007/BF03392394