Practitioner Development

Honoring Our Past, Embracing Our Future.

Thompson (2017) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2017
★ The Verdict

This is a welcome letter, not a study—no new tactics to use.

✓ Read this if History buffs who want a five-minute tour of verbal behavior research milestones.
✗ Skip if Clinicians hunting for fresh language interventions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Tarlow (2017) wrote the first editorial for The Analysis of Verbal Behavior under its new editor.

The piece looks back at 33 years of published studies and thanks past authors, reviewers, and readers.

02

What they found

There is no new data. The editorial simply reaffirms the journal will keep welcoming both basic and applied work on verbal behavior.

03

How this fits with other research

Leigland (2000) counted every author who had ever published in the journal and showed the pool kept growing. Tarlow (2017) celebrates that same growth as proof the field is healthy.

Ming (2018), the very next editorial, keeps the party going but adds a to-do list: invite more women, international teams, and non-behaviorists to submit papers. Together the two editorials form a hand-off speech—first cheers for the past, then a roadmap for the future.

Kirby et al. (2022) pick up the inclusivity theme and give it teeth. They tell BCBAs to practice cultural reciprocity—ask families about their values before you teach. That action step turns the journal’s vague "embrace diversity" line into something you can do in your next parent meeting.

04

Why it matters

The editorial is a quick reminder that verbal behavior research is alive and expanding. If you teach language to kids with autism, you now have decades of peer-reviewed tactics at your fingertips and a journal that keeps asking for more. Use that back catalog. Pair it with the cultural humility tips from Kirby et al. (2022) and you’ll both honor the past and push the field forward.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open the journal archive, search "mand training," and download one 2020 study to pilot this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Much has changed since the first issue of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) was published in February of 1963. John F. Kennedy was President, Beatlemania was the rage in the U.K. but hardly anyone knew about the band in the United States, and the Bell Telephone Company (later know as AT&T) was getting ready to launch the newfangled “touch tone phone” with 10 buttons (no star, no hashtag). The Association's newest publication was titled Mental Retardation, a term which had not yet accumulated sufficient baggage to be considered pejorative. Potential authors either prepared their manuscripts on typewriters, or handwrote their manuscripts and solicited the services of typists to produce final drafts. Submissions, distribution of manuscripts to reviewers, reviewer feedback, and editorial decisions were all accomplished though the postal service. Personal computers, online submission systems, and E-journals would have been utterly foreign concepts to the journal's early contributors.Although much has changed, much has stayed the same. IDD's first editor, Glenn E. Milligan (1963), introduced the first issue by explaining “This new publication is to be devoted to interpreting research findings, reporting of demonstrations, describing new approaches and methods, and analyzing problems faced by professional persons. . . .” (p. 2). Over time, the journal's focus has not really changed so much as it has become clearer. Today's IDD provides an outlet for researchers to report the results of investigations that are relevant to the work and interests of professionals from diverse disciplines, an avenue for policy analysis and recommendations, and a forum to respectfully and thoughtfully share perspectives on critical issues facing the field. It is a great honor to have been selected as the new Editor.I want to express my appreciation for the guidance, the patience, and the excellent humor that IDD's outgoing Editor, Dr. Glenn Fugiura, has provided to me during the transition. I would be remiss if I did not give a “shout out” to Kathleen McLane and Michael Winfield from AAIDD for all of their encouragement and support, as well as to the good people at Allen Press who have been willing to answer all of my questions as I learned to navigate the links and folders that comprise AllenTrack, the web-based manuscript management system. IDD's consulting editors have shown themselves to be an amazing group of scholars, who approach each review very thoughtfully and make every effort to be helpful. High-quality reviews assure the credibility of the journal, and it has been evident to me that IDD's consulting editors are up to the task. Finally, I am thrilled to be working with the “Dream Team” of Associate Editors who agreed to begin this journey with me: Susan Havercamp, Amy Hewitt, Hedda Meadan, Jim Patton, and Bob Schalock.Since its inception, IDD has been a “must read” for leaders in the interdisciplinary field of intellectual disability and related developmental disabilities. Its success is not only a credit to the eight editors who preceded me, but to the many authors who have contributed to the journal over time. I'm truly grateful to all who choose to submit their work for potential publication in IDD. In the end, any journal is only as good as the people who write for it. I am confident that the legacy of IDD will be preserved during my tenure as Editor because the field of IDD is replete with colleagues who are willing to invest their time and effort in the challenging, but ultimately rewarding, work of writing.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.1