Gentle teaching and applied behavior analysis: a critical review.
You can mix gentle teaching’s heart with ABA’s tools instead of picking sides.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Jones et al. (1992) read every paper they could find on gentle teaching and ABA. They wanted to see if the two camps had to stay enemies.
The authors wrote a long essay, not a lab study. They looked at how each side defines love, control, and data.
What they found
The review says gentle teaching and ABA can live in the same house. One builds warm bonds, the other builds clear skills.
They list spots where the views clash, then show how to weld them together for people with intellectual disability.
How this fits with other research
Capaldi (1992) landed the same year with the same peace offer. Both papers say you can blend relationship-first care with behavior tech.
Dunlap et al. (2008) and Carr et al. (2002) replay the tune a decade later for PBS and ABA. The fight keeps cooling off as new labels appear.
Hoffmann et al. (2016) add ACT to the mix. They keep the 1992 spirit: take what works, stitch it together, stay inside behavior science.
Why it matters
Stop treating gentle teaching and ABA like rival football teams. Use affection to win trust, then use ABA to teach skills. Your clients with ID get both dignity and data-driven progress in one plan.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start one session with two minutes of pure relationship building before you give any demand.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing controversy surrounding gentle teaching. This paper explores the nature of this controversy with particular reference to the relationship between gentle teaching and applied behavior analysis. Advantages and disadvantages of this approach are discussed, and it is suggested that gentle teaching and applied behavior analysis need not be regarded as mutually exclusive approaches to working with persons with mental retardation.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-853