Practitioner Development

Foundations for a natural science of philosophy.

Fraley (1999) · The Analysis of verbal behavior 1999
★ The Verdict

Philosophy is just verbal behavior, so we can study it like any other operant.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who train staff or debate philosophy with colleagues.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run discrete-trial sessions and never discuss theory.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The author asks a bold question: what if philosophy is just another kind of science?

He maps philosophical talk onto Skinner’s verbal-behavior categories.

The paper is a thought experiment, not an experiment with people.

02

What they found

Philosophical statements become tacts, mands, or intraverbals.

That move puts philosophy inside behaviorology, not the humanities.

The goal is to turn armchair debates into data-driven puzzles.

03

How this fits with other research

Crosbie (1993) already urged us to push verbal-behavior work into the mainstream. Ribes-Iñesta (1999) goes further and swallows the whole philosophy department.

Schmitt (1984) wanted to rename our field "praxics" to dodge philosophy. Ribes-Iñesta (1999) keeps the name behavior analysis but redefines what counts as philosophy.

Eagle (1985) said behavior analysis can power economics. Ribes-Iñesta (1999) says it can also power philosophy.

04

Why it matters

If you supervise RBTs who ask "why are we talking about mind stuff?", this paper gives you a script. You can treat every philosophical claim as verbal behavior to be shaped, not argued with. Next team meeting, try labeling a coworker’s statement as a mand or tact. The conversation turns from belief to data, and that’s the habit Ribes-Iñesta (1999) wants us to build.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one philosophical comment today, label its verbal operant, and reinforce a clearer tact.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The functional relations among philosophy, science, technology, and intuition are examined. Those domains are each defined as behaviors, and each of them is then classified either as verbal, nonverbal, or both. Finally, those classes of behavior are organized into one integral behavioral system. The concept of a science of philosophy is introduced. A science and technology of philosophy are not only possible but necessary. Such an approach to the discipline of philosophy could lead to a new disciplinary structure for philosophy. Philosophy could be taught in academic departments as a verbal behavioral science. The discipline of behaviorology provides the foundations necessary to capacitate the traditional discipline of philosophy as a science and technology of verbal behavior commensurate with its potential cultural mission.

The Analysis of verbal behavior, 1999 · doi:10.1007/BF03392950