Exploring paraprofessional and classroom factors affecting teacher supervision.
Show teachers what aides can do - they'll supervise more when they see real skills.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team asked the teachers about how they supervise their classroom aides.
They wanted to know what makes teachers watch aides more or less closely.
Teachers worked in classrooms with kids who had mild to severe disabilities.
What they found
Teachers gave more supervision when they thought their aides were highly skilled.
Aides in classrooms with more severe disabilities got more teacher attention.
Skill level mattered more than years on the job.
How this fits with other research
MSáez-Suanes et al. (2023) shows most BCBA supervision papers are just opinions. This survey adds real data about what drives supervision in schools.
Falligant et al. (2025) proves group training plus quick feedback works. Our study shows why that feedback matters - teachers supervise more when they see competence.
Plant et al. (2007) used visual feedback to boost teacher praise. Our work says the same principle applies to supervision - show teachers what aides can do, and they'll supervise more.
Why it matters
Next time you train aides, make their skills visible to teachers. Create a simple one-page skill sheet. List what each aide can do - prompting, data collection, behavior plans. Share it with teachers. This small step can double supervision time, especially in classrooms serving kids with severe needs.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Make a one-page aide skill sheet and give it to teachers before next session
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Paraprofessionals serve a primary role in supporting students with disabilities in the classroom, which necessitates teachers' supervision as a means to improve their practice. Yet, little is known regarding what factors affect teacher supervision. AIMS: We sought to identify how paraprofessional competence and classroom type affected the levels of teacher direction. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We administered an adapted version of the Paraprofessional Needs, Knowledge & Tasks Survey and the Survey for Teachers Supervising Paraprofessionals to teachers supervising paraprofessionals in elementary schools. Structural Equation Modeling was used to examine the link between paraprofessional competence and classroom factors affecting the level of teacher supervision. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Our results indicated that when teachers perceived paraprofessionals as being more skilled, they provided more supervision, and when more supervision was provided the less they thought paraprofessionals should be doing their assigned tasks. Additionally, paraprofessionals working in classrooms with more students with mild disabilities received less supervision than paraprofessionals working in classrooms with more students with moderate-to-severe disabilities. Those paraprofessionals in classrooms serving mostly children with mild disabilities were also perceived as having lower levels of skill competence than those serving in classrooms with students with more moderate-to-severe disabilities. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: By understanding the factors that affect teacher supervision, policy and professional development opportunities can be refined/developed to better support both supervising teachers and paraprofessionals and, in turn, improve the outcomes of children with disabilities.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2018 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.013