Practitioner Development

Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies

LeBlanc et al. (2018) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2018
★ The Verdict

Build a small in-house review board and you can run ethical studies without a university.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who direct or work in independent ABA agencies that want to collect data.
✗ Skip if BCBAs who already have university IRB access or only do single-case clinical work.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

LeBlanc et al. (2018) wrote a how-to guide for small ABA agencies. They asked, "How can we review our own studies without a university IRB?"

The paper lists every step to build a Research Review Committee inside an agency. It covers membership, paperwork, and quick timelines.

02

What they found

An in-house committee can protect clients the same way a big university board does. The guide gives ready forms so agencies can start today.

03

How this fits with other research

Peters et al. (2013) said ethics boards in low-income countries must fit local culture. LeBlanc borrows that idea and shrinks it to single-agency size.

Quigley et al. (2025) wants a standing ethics column in journals so the whole field can talk. LeBlanc starts the talk at the agency level; Quigley widens it to the world.

Iqbal (2002) warned that staff quit ethical programs when rules feel too heavy. LeBlanc answers with a light, fast committee so staff will still use it.

04

Why it matters

If you run or work in a private ABA agency, you can now start a Research Review Committee this month. You get sample forms, clear roles, and a one-week review turn-around. This keeps your clients safe and lets you publish data without waiting for a university IRB.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick three staff, print the paper's sample checklist, and review your next data project this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Conducting research in practice settings is the primary mechanism for establishing a strong foundation of evidence for clinical decision making. In behavior analysis, this type of research frequently originates from university-based systems that have established institutional review boards. Independent human service agencies that want to contribute applied research to the literature base that is clinically meaningful and conducted in an ethical fashion must establish a research review committee (RRC). The purpose of this article is to provide information and guidance for establishing and maintaining the activity of an RRC in a human service setting.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2018 · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-0206-3