Engineering technology and behavior analysis for interdisciplinary environmental protection.
Partner with whoever owns the tech in your setting and bolt on a simple reinforcement plan so people actually use it.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors wrote a think-piece, not an experiment. They asked why shiny green gadgets often sit unused. They argued that engineers and behavior analysts rarely talk to each other.
The paper maps a dream team: engineers build the tech, behavior analysts build the contingencies. Together they could make solar panels, smart meters, and recycling bins actually get used.
What they found
No data tables here. The finding is a warning: cool hardware fails when human behavior is ignored. A thermostat that learns your schedule is useless if no one sets it.
The authors claim the missing piece is reinforcement. Pair the new tech with immediate payoffs for the user and the planet.
How this fits with other research
Twyman (2025) updates the same idea for schools. Instead of energy tech, she moves ABA practices into K-12 classrooms using a pilot-adapt-scale loop.
Mace (1994) also answers the call, but inside our own field. He says basic and applied wings must talk so lab discoveries turn into usable tools.
Vincent et al. (2025) show the target’s dream already lives in LEND programs. Behavior analysts now train side-by-side with doctors and social workers, proving interdisciplinary tracks can be built.
Why it matters
You don’t need a wind turbine to use this paper. Look at any setting where good tools are ignored—clinic software parents won’t log in to, sensory corners teachers skip. Phone the person who controls the tool and offer a tiny behavioral add-on: points, praise, or a raffle for clicking “submit.” One partnership can turn a dusty device into a daily habit.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email the IT or facilities manager, pick one under-used tool, and add an immediate reward for correct use—start with verbal praise, then track data.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Engineering strategies for saving environmental resources have been widespread. However, many of those engineering advances have not been widely accepted nor generally applied by large segments of the general population. This paper considers the need to examine behavioral/environmental variables in the application of engineering technology, with particular reference to specific behavioral strategies for encouraging the use of engineering technology from an interdisciplinary perspective. A model for the study of factors contributing to the solution of ecological/environmental problems is presented and examples of interdisciplinary research are described. The model implies a need for the examination of the effects of antecedent and consequent manipulation of a variety of variables including: behavioral, physiological, environmental, technical and legal conditions. It is concluded that while interdisciplinary research efforts between engineering technologists and behavioral analysts are necessary, they have not received sufficient attention in the literature nor have they focused on the comprehensive study of antecedents and consequences as they relate to ecological/environmental problems. Thus, an extended "family" of research efforts is important for the success of these efforts.
The Behavior analyst, 1980 · doi:10.1007/BF03392375