Practitioner Development

Cui bono? A review of breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon by Daniel C. Dennett.

Rachlin (2007) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2007
★ The Verdict

Selection shapes single responses, not just whole religions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who train staff or write plans and want a clear way to explain why each consequence counts.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct treatment data or new protocols.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Howard read Dennett’s 2006 book Breaking the Spell. The book says religion evolved because it helped groups survive.

Howard wrote a short review in a behavior journal. He asked, “Where is the selection inside one person’s life?”

02

What they found

Dennett talks about tribes and centuries. He skips how each person’s acts are selected day by day.

Howard says that gap leaves out operant conditioning—the real-time process that shapes what we do.

03

How this fits with other research

Takashima et al. (1994) already filled that gap. They map how the environment picks and triggers each response, just like natural selection picks genes.

Leslie (2006) shows the idea is old. Herbert Spencer wrote in 1855 that consequences select behavior, long before Skinner.

Neuringer et al. (2017) pull from another philosopher, Epicurus, to show how selection can guide good lives without punishment. All three papers give the fine-grain selection story Howard wants.

04

Why it matters

When you write a behavior plan, think in two layers. Big cultural rules matter, but the real work is the micro-selection you do each trial. Pair praise, tokens, or breaks with the target act right then. That is the evolutionary force inside one lifetime.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

During trials, narrate the moment-to-moment selection: “Right now attention is selecting this mand.”

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The three requirements for a Darwinian evolutionary process are replication, variation and selection. Dennett (2006) discusses various theories of how these three processes, especially selection, may have operated in the evolution of religion. He believes that the origins of religion, like the origins of language and music, may be approached scientifically. He hopes that such investigations will open a dialog between science and religion leading to moderation of current religious extremism. One problem with Dennett's program, illustrating the difficulty of breaking away from creationist thinking, is Dennett's own failure to consider how Darwinian methods may be used to study evolution of behavioral patterns over the lifetime of individual organisms.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2007 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2007.45-06