Practitioner Development

Considering context: an integrative concept for promoting outcomes in the intellectual disability field.

Shogren (2013) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

Write a one-page context map before you write any ID goal.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who coordinate services for adults or children with ID.
✗ Skip if RBTs looking for a 5-minute skill acquisition protocol.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The author wrote a think-piece for intellectual disability services.

He asked teams to stop treating "context" as a vague buzz-word.

Instead, he wants us to define family, school, policy, and culture as measurable parts of every plan.

02

What they found

The paper does not give new data.

It gives a checklist for teams to map context before goals are written.

The claim: when you spell out context, outcomes improve for the person, the family, and the wider community.

03

How this fits with other research

Anthony et al. (2020) extends this idea. They mined COVID-19 papers to show the pandemic became a new layer of context for people with ID.

Stancliffe et al. (2007) used almost the same map for autism. Their "transactional systems" model also tells teams to watch family, school, and policy at the same time.

Burney et al. (2023) add a tool: use quick caregiver interviews to capture context that numbers miss. Together, the four papers say, "Map the system first, then run the intervention."

04

Why it matters

You already write behavior plans. Add one page called "Context Map." List caregiver work hours, bus route, agency rules, and cultural values. Five bullets now can save five weeks of later problem-solving.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open yesterday’s plan and add a box titled "Family-work-school-policy context." Fill it in before the next team meeting.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Abstract In light of the rapid evolution of research, policy, and practice in the intellectual disability (ID) field resulting from shifts in our conceptualization of disability and in frameworks for the diagnosis and classification of ID, systematic consideration of the multiple, interrelated contextual factors that impact research, policy, and practice are necessary to achieve valued outcomes for individuals with disabilities, their families, and society. The purpose of this article is to introduce a recently developed consensus definition of context and elaborate on application of this definition to research, practice, and policy in the ID field, with a specific focus on how context may be able to serve as an integrative concept to support the attainment of valued outcomes in the disability field for individuals with disabilities, their families, and society.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.2.132