Community applications of instructional technology: teaching writers of instructional packages.
A tiny writing guide turns neighbors into skilled lesson writers whose students learn faster.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Lobb et al. (1977) asked, "Can a short writing manual turn regular people into good lesson writers?"
They gave a one-page guide to neighborhood residents. The guide showed how to write clear steps, check for understanding, and give practice chances.
Then they watched who used the guide and who did not. They used a multiple-baseline design across people.
What they found
People who read the manual wrote much better lessons. Their lessons had clear goals, small steps, and checks for learning.
Students who used these lessons learned skills faster than students who used lessons from untrained writers.
How this fits with other research
Walsh et al. (2019) later used a brief flash-card manual to teach medical students IV-fluid skills. Both studies show a short written guide can quickly build professional skill.
Tsami et al. (2023) and Salomone et al. (2022) moved the same idea into caregiver training. They packaged behavior plans so parents across Asia and Italy could run them at home. The 1977 paper is the seed; the newer papers grow it in telehealth and clinics.
Dykens et al. (1991) used the same multiple-baseline design with hospital nurses. Both studies prove the design works for adult staff training, just in different jobs.
Why it matters
You do not need a long course to build good staff. A one-page writing checklist can lift lesson quality and learner gains. Try giving your RBTs or parents a simple template: goal, materials, step list, practice trials, and mastery check. Watch their programs improve next week.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand your staff a one-page lesson template and score one program they write this week against it.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A community education program, to develop a variety of performance competencies in large numbers of neighborhood residents, requires a technology for preparing learning units administerable by community members themselves. The effects of a writing manual, designed to teach nonprofessionals to prepare such instructional packages, were analyzed in two experiments. Experiment I employed a multiple-baseline design across three university student trainees. The results showed that appropriate program writing increased by 75% after completion of the manual. The results of Experiment II, with two low-income neighborhood residents serving as trainees, showed that packages produced by trained writers resulted in a greater increase in skill activities than sets of training stimuli produced by untrained writers.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-739