Practitioner Development

Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations.

Matson et al. (2005) · Research in developmental disabilities 2005
★ The Verdict

Pick a clinical Ph.D. program by counting faculty publications, not just famous names.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who supervise interns or plan their own doctoral work.
✗ Skip if RBTs with no plans for graduate school.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The authors counted every peer-reviewed paper and citation from faculty at 157 APA-approved clinical psychology Ph.D. programs.

They used public databases, not reputation surveys, to build a new ranking list.

02

What they found

Programs that publish the most heavily cited work rose to the top of the data-driven list.

Some well-known schools scored lower when only hard counts were used.

03

How this fits with other research

Sturmey (2009) shows that behavioral activation is now evidence-based. If you want training in that treatment, Baker et al. (2005) tells you which Ph.D. programs produce the most-cited behavior research.

Slanzi et al. (2024) teaches you to collect data with Countee; Baker et al. (2005) uses the same spirit—turn raw counts into better decisions.

Burney et al. (2023) urge behavior analysts to add qualitative interviews for social validity. Baker et al. (2005) stays purely quantitative, so the two pieces complement rather than clash.

04

Why it matters

Use the table to guide interns or yourself toward programs that publish often in behavior analysis. A school that lands high on this citation list is more likely to offer solid supervision and ongoing research you can join.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open the paper’s ranking table and add the top five behavior-heavy programs to your intern-placement list.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Program rankings and their visibility have taken on greater and greater significance. Rarely is the accuracy of these rankings, which are typically based on a small subset of university faculty impressions, questioned. This paper presents a more comprehensive survey method based on quantifiable measures of faculty publications and citations. The most frequently published core clinical faculty across 157 APA-approved clinical programs are listed. The implications of these data are discussed.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2005 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.003