Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations.
Pick a clinical Ph.D. program by counting faculty publications, not just famous names.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors counted every peer-reviewed paper and citation from faculty at 157 APA-approved clinical psychology Ph.D. programs.
They used public databases, not reputation surveys, to build a new ranking list.
What they found
Programs that publish the most heavily cited work rose to the top of the data-driven list.
Some well-known schools scored lower when only hard counts were used.
How this fits with other research
Sturmey (2009) shows that behavioral activation is now evidence-based. If you want training in that treatment, Baker et al. (2005) tells you which Ph.D. programs produce the most-cited behavior research.
Slanzi et al. (2024) teaches you to collect data with Countee; Baker et al. (2005) uses the same spirit—turn raw counts into better decisions.
Burney et al. (2023) urge behavior analysts to add qualitative interviews for social validity. Baker et al. (2005) stays purely quantitative, so the two pieces complement rather than clash.
Why it matters
Use the table to guide interns or yourself toward programs that publish often in behavior analysis. A school that lands high on this citation list is more likely to offer solid supervision and ongoing research you can join.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open the paper’s ranking table and add the top five behavior-heavy programs to your intern-placement list.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Program rankings and their visibility have taken on greater and greater significance. Rarely is the accuracy of these rankings, which are typically based on a small subset of university faculty impressions, questioned. This paper presents a more comprehensive survey method based on quantifiable measures of faculty publications and citations. The most frequently published core clinical faculty across 157 APA-approved clinical programs are listed. The implications of these data are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2005 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.003