Beyond modularisation: the need of a socio-neuro-constructionist model of autism.
Autism is not a fixed brain glitch; it grows within families, schools, and screens—so measure and teach with context in mind.
01Research in Context
What this study did
López (2015) wrote a theory paper. It says autism science must stop splitting brain studies from social studies.
The paper argues we need one model that mixes how brains grow with how people live.
What they found
The big idea: autism traits change as kids grow, and culture shapes those traits too.
Old models treat autism like a fixed brain module. Beatriz says that view is too narrow.
How this fits with other research
Krijnen et al. (2026) took the same stance. They told doctors to drop the term "virtual autism" and use "screen-related delay." This shows the 2015 theory now guides real word choices.
Brandsen et al. (2024) tested AI tools. They found the bots tag "I have autism" as worse than "I am a bank robber." This proves social context (like AI bias) really does shape how autism is seen, just as Beatriz warned.
Fleury et al. (2018) asked parents to rate toddlers. Moms with lower schooling or sad mood marked more autism traits. Again, social factors sway the data, backing Beatriz’s call to weave context into every measure.
Why it matters
Next time you pick an assessment, ask: does this tool treat autism like a fixed box, or does it leave room for culture, language, and daily life? Choose tools that let you note context right on the score sheet.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a "context notes" box to your data sheets and fill it every session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Autism is a developmental disorder defined by social and communication impairments. Current theoretical approaches and research studies however conceptualise autism as both static and independent from the social context in which it develops. Two lines of research stand out from this general trend. First, research from the neuroconstructivist approach of Karmiloff-Smith (Hum Brain Mapp 31:934-941, 2010) aims to establish developmental trajectories of cognitive impairments in autism over time. Second, studies from intersubjective approaches such as that of Hobson (The cradle of thought, Macmillan, London, 2002) focus on the influence of emotional engagement in cognitive impairments. Although these two lines of research have made an invaluable contribution towards our understanding of autism, both offer only partial explanations: Intersubjective approaches fail to provide a developmental perspective and the neuroconstructivist model neglects the role of the social context. This paper argues that the nature of autism demands the theoretical and methodological integration of these two approaches so that developmental and social aspects are investigated in tandem.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015 · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1966-9