Autism & Developmental

Trajectories and profiles of adaptive behavior in males with fragile X syndrome: multicenter studies.

Dykens et al. (1996) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1996
★ The Verdict

Boys with fragile X learn fastest under 10, then plateau from 11-20, so front-load your teaching.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with boys with fragile X in clinic or school settings
✗ Skip if BCBAs serving only adult clients or girls with fragile X

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers tracked 186 boys with fragile X for up to 20 years. They used the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales every year. The boys came from four medical centers across the United States.

The team wanted to see how daily living, communication, and social skills changed over time. They split the boys into three age groups: 1-10 years, 11-20 years, and 21-30 years.

02

What they found

Skills grew fast before age 10. Daily living skills like brushing teeth improved the most. Communication skills improved the least.

From 11 to 20 years, growth stopped. Scores stayed flat. After age 21, skills held steady. The gap between daily living and communication skills got bigger with age.

03

How this fits with other research

Gaylord-Ross et al. (1995) studied teens with mild intellectual disability. They found motivation matters during the plateau years. This matches E et al.'s flat scores from 11-20 years.

Lyall et al. (2012) showed that higher ability toddlers with ASD had more behavior problems. This seems different from E et al.'s findings. But Kristen studied challenging behaviors, not adaptive skills. The papers look at different outcomes.

Matson et al. (2008) created cut-off scores for social skills in adults with severe ID. Their work helps the endpoint of E et al.'s trajectory. Together they show the full lifespan picture.

04

Why it matters

Plan intensive teaching before age 10 when learning is fastest. During the teen plateau, focus on maintaining skills and building motivation. Use adult scores as realistic long-term targets. This helps you set age-appropriate goals and explain progress to families.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Check your client's age. If under 10, add two extra adaptive goals this week. If 11-20, shift to maintenance and motivation strategies.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
187
Population
developmental delay
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

We conducted two multicenter studies on adaptive trajectories and profiles in males with fragile X syndrome. Study 1 longitudinally assessed 29 males ages 1-20 years using age-equivalent scores from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Fragile X boys ages 1-10 years showed significant gains in adaptive skills from first to second testing; males ages 11-20 years were stable in their adaptive development. Study 2 cross-sectionally examined 132 males ages 1-20 years. Significant age-related gains were found in boys ages 1-10, particularly in preschool children. Subjects ages 11-20 showed increased variability and nonsignificant relations between age and adaptive skills. Preliminary findings from 26 young adults with fragile X syndrome ages 21-40 years showed stable age-equivalent adaptive scores during these years. Relative strengths in daily living skills and weaknesses in communication were only evident among older subjects. Significant relations were found between adaptive behavior standard scores and IQ; these two scores also showed age-related declines that likely parallel one another. Findings are related to adaptive features in other genetic syndromes, and to directions for future adaptive behavior research.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1996 · doi:10.1007/BF02172475