Assessing and training teachers in the generalized use of behavior modification with autistic children.
Fluency first: kids with autism improve only after teachers master behavior skills through paced rehearsal.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Hopkins et al. (1977) trained 11 teachers to use behavior-mod tricks with autistic kids.
They used a behavioral-skills-training package: explain, model, practice, and feedback.
Kids improved only after every teacher hit a high fluency score across settings.
What they found
All teachers quickly reached the mastery line and used the skills in new rooms.
Child progress showed up only after staff were fluent—no gains during baseline.
How this fits with other research
Wallander et al. (1983) later swapped teachers for siblings and got the same pattern: train first, then kids bloom.
Griffith et al. (2012) tried a one-day workshop instead; staff knew more but helped less—short dose backfires.
Kisbu-Sakarya et al. (2021) showed lecture-style training lifts willingness yet leaves attitudes flat; skills still need drill.
The 1977 study is the root: heavy practice beats quick talks.
Why it matters
Before you chase child goals, lock staff fluency. Run rehearsal with feedback until each teacher hits 90 % correct across two rooms. Then, and only then, expect learner gains. Make mastery the gate, not the afterthought.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one pivotal skill, run five rapid cycles of model-practice-feedback with each staffer, and require 90 % correct before the child enters the session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study investigated the feasibility of developing reliable, valid criteria for measuring and training the skills necessary to teach autistic children. The behaviors of 11 teachers and 12 autistic children were recorded in a series of different teaching situation. Teacher-training was initiated at different times for different teachers. The results showed: (1) it was possible to asses empirically whether a teacher was correctly using defined behavior-modification techniques; (2) generally, for any given session, systematic improvement in the child's behavior did not occur unless the teacher working in that session had been trained to use the techniques to a hight criterion; (3) all 11 teachers were rapidly trained to use these techniques; and (4) the teachers learned generalized skills effective with a variety of children and target behaviors.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-197