A self-paced programmed undergraduate course in the experimental analysis of behavior.
Letting college students set their own pace through programmed booklets kept every learner engaged to the end.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors built a self-paced course that taught college students how to run basic behavior experiments.
Students worked through paper booklets at their own speed. They could move ahead only after answering every question correctly.
No lectures. No set class times. Just the booklets and a few lab stations open all week.
What they found
Once students started, they kept working at a steady clip. No one quit the course, even though the workload was heavy.
Most students said they liked the format and felt they learned more than in regular classes.
How this fits with other research
Guinness et al. (2024) later moved the same idea online. Their grad students mastered APA citations with a self-paced checklist and short email feedback.
Rojahn et al. (1994) added a 10-second pause after each question. The brief wait let students study the screen and score higher on the next item.
Watson et al. (2007) swapped plain reading for interactive programmed lessons. Undergrads who used the new lessons used ABA terms more correctly in essays.
Together, these studies show the 1969 paper started a line of work that keeps growing: give learners control, add tiny supports, and mastery rises.
Why it matters
You can copy the core idea today. Break any staff training into small, self-checked steps. Let each person move at their own speed. Add quick delays or hints only when scores stall. This keeps trainees engaged, cuts live lecture time, and still hits high fidelity.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Split your next staff training into 2-minute self-checked chunks and let staff move ahead only after 100% correct.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A method of programming a variety of assignments in a course was described. The instructions to students, the course assignments, and the grading system were presented in detail. The rate at which students performed the activities was examined. Different students began working at different times during the semester, but once a student began to complete assignments he continued to work at a rate comparable to all other students. No students stopped working after once beginning to work. The majority of the students liked the course despite being overworked. Several changes in the method were suggested based on the data from this course.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1969 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-125