Autism & Developmental

Walker devices and microswitch technology to enhance assisted indoor ambulation by persons with multiple disabilities: three single-case studies.

Lancioni et al. (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

A microswitch that delivers a quick song or vibration turns a passive walker into a powerful reinforcer, doubling independent steps for people with severe multiple disabilities.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching ambulation to children or adults with profound motor and intellectual disabilities.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with clients who already walk independently or who use wheelchairs full-time.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Three children and adults with severe intellectual and motor disabilities used a walker fitted with a microswitch. Every time the person pushed the walker forward, the switch played a brief preferred stimulus—music, vibration, or lights.

The team counted pushes and steps during baseline, then during the walker-plus-switch condition. They also tracked happiness and problem behavior for one adult.

02

What they found

All three participants quickly doubled or tripled their independent pushes. The adult also showed fewer problem behaviors and more smiles or vocalizations while walking.

Gains appeared within the first few sessions and stayed high.

03

How this fits with other research

Smith et al. (2010) ran a near-identical setup with five children and saw the same jump in steps. The 2013 study adds adults and monitors happiness, acting as a direct replication with a wider age range.

Van Hanegem et al. (2014) kept the microswitch idea but taught head lifts and proper foot placement instead of just forward steps. That paper extends this work—showing the switch can reinforce other motor targets too.

Krentz et al. (2016) also boosted walking for adults with ID, yet used tokens in a gym, not a walker. Same goal, different tool; both give you two proven choices.

Blanchard et al. (1979) taught adults to walk without any walker or switch—just backward chaining along a sidewalk. Their success reminds us that low-tech chaining still works; the new tech simply speeds up the first strides for people who cannot stand alone.

04

Why it matters

If a client barely stands, strap a microswitch to the walker and let preferred stimuli do the work. You will see more steps, less problem behavior, and happier faces in a single afternoon. No extra staff, no tokens, just immediate sensory payoff for every push.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tape a button switch to the walker handle, plug in a preferred 3-s audio clip, and deliver it every time the client makes one forward push—count pushes for ten minutes and compare to baseline.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
developmental delay, intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

These three single-case studies assessed the use of walker devices and microswitch technology for promoting ambulation behavior among persons with multiple disabilities. The walker devices were equipped with support and weight lifting features. The microswitch technology ensured that brief stimulation followed the participants' ambulation responses. The participants were two children (i.e., Study I and Study II) and one man (i.e., Study III) with poor ambulation performance. The ambulation efforts of the child in Study I involved regular steps, while those of the child in Study II involved pushing responses (i.e., he pushed himself forward with both feet while sitting on the walker's saddle). The man involved in Study III combined his poor ambulation performance with problem behavior, such as shouting or slapping his face. The results were positive for all three participants. The first two participants had a large increase in the number of steps/pushes performed during the ambulation events provided and in the percentages of those events that they completed independently. The third participant improved his ambulation performance as well as his general behavior (i.e., had a decline in problem behavior and an increase in indices of happiness). The wide-ranging implications of the results are discussed.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.025