The perception of animacy in young children with autism.
A short game that highlights ‘alive’ motion brings autistic preschoolers up to typical levels, so the skill is there—just waiting for clear teaching.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Gadow et al. (2006) showed simple cartoons to three groups: preschoolers with autism, kids with general delays, and typical kids.
Each clip showed moving shapes. Some moved in a lifelike way, as if chasing. Others moved randomly.
Children had to pick the ‘alive’ clip. After a few practice rounds the researchers ran the real test.
What they found
At first the autism group picked the ‘alive’ clips less often than the other kids.
After only a short training game their scores jumped up to the same level.
The skill was not missing—just buried until someone showed them what to look for.
How this fits with other research
Congiu et al. (2010) seems to disagree. They tested older, high-functioning students and still saw animacy trouble even with hints. The gap is age: little kids catch up fast; teens may need longer or different teaching.
Xenitidis et al. (2010) extends the idea into language. Verbal adults with autism put animate words first in sentences, proving the ‘alive’ concept is intact in a new domain.
Begeer et al. (2006) conceptually replicates the pattern: when you tell autistic kids why social cues matter, their looking behavior normalizes—just like the animacy scores here once training made the cue meaningful.
Why it matters
Do not assume a child who ignores lifelike motion lacks the ability. Run a quick demo, point out chase patterns, and test again. A five-minute warm-up can save you months of wrong goals and give the child a new way to read the social world.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Before a social-skills group, show two 10-second shape cartoons: one random, one chasing. Ask, ‘Which one looks alive?’ Prompt once, then start your lesson.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Visual perception may be a developmental prerequisite to some types of social understanding. The ability to perceive social information given visual motion appears to develop early. However, children with autism have profound deficits in social cognitive function and may fail to see social motion in the same way that typically developing children do. We tested the hypothesis that children with autism fail to discriminate animate motion, using a novel paradigm involving simple geometric figures. The subjects were 23 children with autism (c.a. 70.7 mos.), 18 children with other developmental disabilities (c.a. 68.2 mos.), and 18 typically developing children (c.a. 46.4 mos.). Children saw two circles moving on a screen and were rewarded for identifying the one that moved as if animate. A control condition required children to identify the heavier of two objects. Children with autism initially showed a deficit in categorizing objects as animate (though no deficit on the control task), but showed no deficit in this ability after they had reached criterion in the training phase. These results are discussed in terms of the social orienting theory of autism, and the possibility that animacy perception might be preserved in autism, even if it is not used automatically.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2006 · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0136-8