Autism & Developmental

The effects of incorporating extended conversations into video-based story retelling instruction on oral narrative skills in adolescents with intellectual disability in China.

Li et al. (2021) · Research in developmental disabilities 2021
★ The Verdict

Video story-retelling plus adult questioning and a simple five-finger visual ups sentence length and story parts for teens with ID, though smooth links lag behind.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running language groups for middle- or high-school students with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on early childhood or on articulation goals.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Li et al. (2021) tested a video story-retelling package on three teens with intellectual disability in China. Each session had two parts: first the teen watched a short cartoon, then an adult paused the video often to ask open questions and stretch the talk. A ‘Story Hand’ visual—five fingers for who, where, problem, feels, ending—sat on the table as a cue. The team tracked micro-details such as sentence length, new words, and story parts across baseline, teaching, and a one-month follow-up.

02

What they found

All three teens spoke in longer sentences and used more story pieces after the lessons. New vocabulary and overall story complexity climbed into the moderate-to-high range and stayed there four weeks later. Gains in smooth sentence links—what researchers call cohesion—were small and shaky. In short, the package helped teens tell richer stories, but their telling still sounded choppy.

03

How this fits with other research

Xie et al. (2024) seems to disagree at first glance. Their enactment strategy helped autistic and ID kids less than it helped typical peers, while Huan’s video-plus-talk method produced clear narrative growth. The gap is in the task: Tingting tested quick instruction recall; Huan worked on longer, creative language. Different targets, different payoff.

Sisson et al. (1993) is an earlier cousin. Mothers with ID learned to chat more at home and their toddlers gained words. Both studies show that steady, structured conversation—whether from a parent or a video partner—lifts language in people with ID.

Jones et al. (2024) adds a toddler angle. Caregivers who used directive NDBI comments saw the biggest language jumps, echoing Huan’s use of adult-led questions during the video. Across ages, guided talk beats free play for expressive gains.

04

Why it matters

If you serve teens with ID, you now have a low-cost script: pick a 3-minute clip, pause to ask ‘who, where, problem, feels, ending,’ and keep the Story Hand card in view. Expect bigger sentences and richer plots, but keep cohesion goals on the IEP and teach linking words like ‘because’ or ‘next’ in separate lessons. One month of lessons gave durable gains for these three students—worth a try in your next social-skills block.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Load a 2-minute cartoon clip, print a hand-outline graphic, and pause twice to ask open story questions during your next session.

02At a glance

Intervention
video modeling
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
3
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
mixed
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oral narrative language is a persistent area of language difficulty for individuals with intellectual disability (ID). This study aims to explore the effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention program that incorporates extended conversations into video-based story retelling instruction with a novel visual support strategy, Story Hand, to develop oral narrative skills in adolescents with ID in China. METHODS: Using a single-case multiple-probe across participants design, the researchers examined whether the comprehensive intervention program could improve participants' oral narrative skills both microstructurally and macrostructurally. RESULTS: All three participants demonstrated moderate to high treatment effects in the microstructural narrative outcomes (i.e., the mean length of utterance in morphemes [MLU-M] and the number of different words [NDW]) and one of the macrostructural narrative outcomes (i.e., the complexity of story grammar [SG-complexity]) in response to the comprehensive intervention program, and these acquired effects were maintained at a high level for up to one month. However, all three participants demonstrated limited treatment effects in one of the macrostructural narrative outcomes (i.e., cohesion) in response to the comprehensive intervention program. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The comprehensive intervention program that incorporates extended conversations into visually supported video-based story retelling instruction offers an option for teachers to develop oral narrative skills in adolescents with ID. However, the relative effectiveness of the different components of the intervention needs to be further explored.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2021 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104116