The cognitive benefits of bilingualism in autism spectrum disorder: Is theory of mind boosted and by which underlying factors?
Bilingual children with autism understand others’ minds better than matched monolingual peers, so keep the home language alive.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team compared bilingual and monolingual children with autism.
They used false-belief tasks to test Theory of Mind.
All kids had autism but spoke either one language or two.
What they found
Bilingual kids scored higher on false-belief tasks.
The edge was medium-sized and did not come from better language or executive-function scores.
Simply using two languages linked to better perspective-taking.
How this fits with other research
Peristeri et al. (2024) followed the same kids for three more years.
They saw the bilingual advantage grow into second-order false-belief, driven by richer vocabulary and higher IQ.
Peristeri et al. (2021) looks like a contradiction at first.
That study found ToM deficits in Greek-speaking children with autism.
The twist: those children were mostly monolingual, so the data line up once language status is counted.
Storch et al. (2012) adds that stronger second-order false-belief predicts fewer social problems in teens, hinting the bilingual boost could matter for real-life friendships.
Why it matters
If a family speaks a heritage language, you can now support keeping it.
No evidence shows dropping the home tongue helps autism outcomes, and it may even sharpen social-cognitive skills.
When you write reports, note bilingual status before labeling ToM delays.
Consider false-belief tasks in both languages to see the child’s best performance.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Ask every parent what languages are spoken at home and add that note to the assessment header.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined whether bilingualism boosts Theory of Mind as measured by a non-verbal false belief (FB) task in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and how this potential boost may stem from improvements in a variety of other domains, namely executive functions (EFs), language, metalinguistic awareness skills, as well as autism severity. One hundred and three children with ASD (7- to 15-year-olds) (43 bilingual and 60 age- and IQ-matched monolingual children) were tested on a nonverbal task of attentional switching, working memory and updating task, and an online, low-verbal first-order FB task. Results showed a clear FB benefit for bilingual children with ASD as compared with their monolingual peers. There were also boosts in EF, however, there is no evidence that these EF boosts drove the FB advantage. Enhanced FB was not explained either by language, metalinguistic skills, or lower autism severity. While the results do not conclusively settle the debate on what triggers the ToM advantage in bilingual children with ASD, the empirical picture of the current study suggests that the ToM component of FB understanding in bilingual children with ASD is enhanced by the bilingual experience per se. LAY SUMMARY: The current study aimed to determine if and how bilingualism may improve the ability to understand others' beliefs in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We assessed their belief reasoning alongside a series of other skills hypothesized to be beneficial for such reasoning, namely understanding, producing, and thinking about language, recalling and switching between information, and the severity of their autistic symptoms. The overall findings highlight advantages for bilingual children with ASD over their monolingual peers for grasping beliefs, thus suggesting that pursuing bilingualism may be beneficial for cognition in ASD. Other boosts were also associated with bilingualism, such as recalling and switching between information, but these boosts were not directly related to belief understanding, highlighting the beneficial role of bilingualism per se.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2021 · doi:10.1002/aur.2542