Teaching deception skills in a game-play context to three adolescents with autism.
Five minutes of shaping turns a simple coin game into a fast way to teach autistic teens to deceive.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three autistic teens played a simple hand game with a teacher. The teen hid a coin in one fist and the teacher guessed which hand.
The goal was to teach the teens to trick the teacher by putting the coin in the opposite hand. The team used shaping. They praised every tiny step toward hiding the coin in the “wrong” hand.
Sessions lasted only five minutes. The study used a multiple-baseline design across the three students.
What they found
All three teens learned to deceive. They began to pick the opposite hand on purpose.
The teacher’s correct guesses dropped from 50 % to almost 0 %. The teens smiled or laughed when they tricked the adult.
Skill appeared after 6–9 short sessions for each student.
How this fits with other research
Cox et al. (2017) used the same shaping logic to teach kids with autism to lie still for an MRI. Both studies break a hard skill into tiny pieces and reward each step.
Laposa et al. (2017) used differential reinforcement with detained teens. Like R et al., they saw quick drops in problem behavior and big gains in rule following. The method works across settings.
TCruz-Montecinos et al. (2024) used DRL as a group contingency in an autism classroom. Their result shows the procedure scales from one teen to a whole table.
Why it matters
You can teach subtle social skills like deception in minutes with a pocket coin. Shaping plus praise works for teens who rarely lie on purpose. Try it during break time to build flexible thinking. The same steps—watch, wait, reward closer tries—fit any new social play you want to seed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Grab a coin, play the guessing game, and praise any move toward the opposite hand.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Baron-Cohen (1992) found that students with autism are impaired in their ability to deceive. A multiple-baseline across-subjects design was conceptualized to test the hypothesis that such students could be taught to deceive. Two conditions were presented in baseline and treatment phases. In Condition 1, the student guessed in which hand a small object was hidden when the experimenter presented two closed fists. In Condition 2, the student hid the object and presented two closed fists to the experimenter for a guess. Reinforcement was delivered contingently upon independent guessing during Condition 1 in both baseline and treatment phases. Under Condition 2, reinforcement was delivered noncontingently during the baseline phase and contingently upon successive approximations to the target behavior of deception during the treatment phase. All students displayed the acquisition of at least three of the responses included in the deception response during the baseline phase, and two students showed an erratic acquisition of the total skill during the baseline phase. Results indicate that students with autism can learn to deceive, even without formal intensive training.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1997 · doi:10.1023/a:1025835706522