Neologisms and idiosyncratic language in autistic speakers.
Autistic children coin more made-up words as language demands rise, so treat these moments as windows into their mapping system, not just errors.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team listened to speech samples from autistic children, kids with intellectual disability, and neurotypical peers.
They counted made-up words and odd phrases that only the speaker seemed to understand.
No one tried to teach or fix anything; they just recorded what each child said.
What they found
Autistic children used more made-up words and odd phrases than the other two groups.
These quirky words did not link to one single cause like low IQ or poor social skill.
The stranger words often popped up when the child tried to talk about harder ideas.
How this fits with other research
Tsao et al. (2003) saw a similar pattern: autistic kids skip typical word errors like under-extension and lean on object parts to name things.
Geelhand et al. (2025) later showed the odd style lasts into adulthood; autistic adults talk more only when paired with non-autistic partners.
Sutherland et al. (2017) seems to clash at first: they proved autistic kids can learn new words. The key difference is J et al. watched free speech while Rebecca et al. taught words on purpose.
Why it matters
Expect novel words during play or conversation, especially when the topic gets tricky. Do not mark every odd word as wrong; instead note the context and gently offer a clear label. If you need to teach new vocabulary, use both rich context and direct definitions, because the 2017 study shows both help. Finally, watch partner mix: mixed-neurotype pairs may need extra time for shared meaning.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →During play, jot any novel word, ask the child to show you what it means, then model the standard word right after.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Language samples from matched groups of 80 autistic, mentally handicapped, and normally developing children were coded for the presence of neologisms and/or idiosyncratic language use. Cognitive, social, or linguistic factors that might account for these errors were identified and assessed. More autistic subjects used neologisms and idiosyncratic language than age- and language skill-matched control groups. No single factor or combination of factors was responsible for this difference. Across diagnostic groups, similar patterns of error were noted, except that the autistic subjects were more likely to use words inappropriately that had no phonological or semantic similarity to the intended English word. For the autistic groups, the frequency of idiosyncratic language increased with language complexity. In contrast, such errors decreased with language skill in the mentally handicapped group. Theoretical implications for determining the nature and source of the language disorder associated with autism are discussed.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1991 · doi:10.1007/BF02284755