Implications of capacity in the classroom: Simplifying tasks for autistic children may not be the answer.
Keep the wall art—just make it lesson-themed so autistic students use their sharp eye for learning, not distraction.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Durbin et al. (2019) watched autistic and neurotypical kids listen to a short story.
Some kids saw lesson-related pictures on the wall. Others saw no extras.
Later the team asked what each child remembered.
What they found
Autistic kids recalled more random wall details than their peers.
They still remembered the main story just as well.
The extras did not hurt; they just needed to match the lesson.
How this fits with other research
Tillmann et al. (2015) showed autistic children keep noticing background sounds even during hard visual tasks. Anna’s team moves the same idea into the classroom: extra visual stuff can be useful, not noise.
Wachob et al. (2015) found no boost when random pictures were added to instructions. That seems to clash with Anna’s positive result, but the difference is relevance. Random pictures confuse; lesson-linked pictures help.
Fantasia et al. (2020) added that letting autistic kids control study pace also lifts memory. Together the papers say: don’t strip the room; just make materials meaningful and give some learner control.
Why it matters
You can stop removing every poster from your classroom walls. Instead, swap fun but off-topic décor for visuals that show today’s vocabulary, steps, or story maps. Autistic students will tap their extra perceptual capacity for learning, not for counting ceiling tiles. It’s a free, low-prep accommodation that respects both their strengths and their need for structure.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape up three pictures that match today’s teaching goal and remove one off-topic poster.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated evidence for increased perceptual capacity in autism: autistic people can process more information at any given time than neurotypical individuals. The implications of this for educating autistic pupils have not been investigated. For example, this ability to process more information at any given time may explain why autistic children sometimes process more peripheral task-irrelevant information than neurotypical individuals (e.g. in background classroom wall-displays). AIMS: The current study assessed the impact of different types of background information on autistic and non-autistic children's ability to perform a learning task. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Autistic (N = 23) and non-autistic (N = 50) children took part in a computer-based task designed to simulate a lesson. They watched three videos of a teacher telling a story, each with a different background condition: blank, relevant images, or irrelevant images. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: When the visual display contained story-relevant information, both groups recalled background information in addition to the central story. When the background displays were irrelevant to the story, autistic children recalled more background information than their neurotypical peers, yet maintained their ability to recall information from the central story. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The current study suggests that pupils' perceptual capacity- including those on the autistic spectrum - can indeed be capitalised on to support learning in the classroom. To do so, however, we must ensure that the child can use their capacity for task-relevant processing, rather than irrelevant distractions.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2019 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.12.006