How do individuals with Asperger syndrome respond to nonliteral language and inappropriate requests in computer-mediated communication?
For clients with Asperger traits, check executive functions as well as verbal skills before teaching online social safety.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers asked how people with Asperger syndrome handle tricky online messages. They looked at nonliteral language like sarcasm and at odd requests such as 'Send me your password.'
Each person sat at a computer and answered chat-style questions. The team also gave short tests of verbal skill and executive functions like planning and switching.
What they found
Verbal ability mattered, but executive skills mattered too. Diagnosis plus these two scores predicted how well someone spotted weird or nonliteral messages.
Age was the only thing linked to understanding sarcasm. Older participants got the joke more often, no matter their verbal or executive scores.
How this fits with other research
Boxum et al. (2018) later showed that college students with ASD can improve writing when taught clear strategies. Together the papers say: target executive supports, not just language drills.
Baldwin et al. (2014) surveyed adults with HFA/Asperger's and found most are underemployed. The 2005 lab data help explain why: even online social rules trip them up.
Vollmer et al. (1996) tested receptive language with facilitated communication and saw no gains. Both studies used tight lab controls, backing the need for evidence-based tools over popular fixes.
Why it matters
Screen-based social tasks are part of life and work. When you assess a client with Asperger traits, add quick executive-function probes like Stroop or card-sort. If scores are low, weave in planning and self-monitoring goals alongside language work. This small shift can make job or college coaching far more useful.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one brief executive-function probe to your intake and use results to decide if you need planning or inhibition goals.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Computer-mediated communication in individuals with Asperger syndrome, Tourette syndrome and normal controls was explored with a program called Bubble Dialogue (Gray, Creighton, McMahon, and Cunninghamn (1991)) in which the users type text into speech bubbles. Two scenarios, based on Happé (1994) were adapted to investigate understanding of figure of speech and sarcasm, and a third, developed by ourselves, looked at responses to inappropriate requests (lending money and disclosing home address on a first meeting). Dialogue transcripts were assessed by 62 raters who were blind to the clinical diagnoses. Hierarchical linear modelling revealed that rated understanding of a figure of speech was predicted mainly by verbal ability and executive ability, as well as by clinical diagnosis, whereas handling inappropriate requests was predicted by age, verbal ability, executive ability and diagnosis. Notably, the Tourette comparison group showed better understanding than the Asperger group in interpreting a figure of speech and handling inappropriate requests, and differences between these groups were possibly attributable to individual differences in executive ability. In contrast, understanding sarcasm was predicted by age but not by either verbal ability, executive ability or clinical diagnosis. Evidently, there is a complicated relation between Asperger syndrome, verbal ability and executive abilities with respect to communicative performance.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2005 · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-5033-z