Effects of tangible and social reinforcers on skill acquisition, stereotyped behavior, and task engagement in three children with autism spectrum disorders.
Trade edible or toy rewards for praise during DTT and keep the same learning speed with less stereotypy.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team ran discrete-trial lessons with three autistic children. Each child got the same lessons twice: once with edible or toy rewards, once with praise, high-fives, and claps. The order flipped each day so no type had an edge.
They tracked how fast each child learned the new skill, how much stereotypy happened, and how often the child stayed on task.
What they found
Both reward types taught the skill at the same speed. Tangibles, however, sparked more hand-flapping and body rocking. Social praise kept stereotypy low while learning stayed high.
Task engagement stayed strong under both conditions, so praise did not cost attention.
How this fits with other research
Wing (1981) rotated edibles and toys within sessions and also saw steady correct responding. Soyeon et al. now show that switching to praise alone can keep those gains and drop stereotypy.
Yanchik et al. (2024) later asked whether toddlers need DTT at all; they found mixing naturalistic play with DTT gives bigger adaptive gains. Soyeon’s result says if you do run table work, use praise to avoid extra stereotypy.
Dell’Aringa et al. (2021) tweaked transfer trials and found no speed boost. Likewise, Soyeon shows the reward form does not speed learning either; the win is cleaner behavior, not faster mastery.
Why it matters
You can keep your teaching pace while cutting toy or food side-effects. Start each program with a quick reinforcer test; if praise works, stay there. If not, fade toys or edibles fast and pair them with social cues so stereotypy stays low. Your data stay flat, but the child looks and feels calmer—an easy Monday swap.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run the first five trials with praise only; if accuracy holds, keep it and tally stereotypy before and after the switch.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are more likely to engage in inappropriate play (e.g., stereotypy, repetitive behavior) with their preferred items given as reinforcers. Considering the stereotyped behavior is a core characteristic of ASD aimed to reduce, it is necessary to identify alternative reinforcers that does not encourage problematic behavior as well as is still effective. In this respect, the present study evaluates a possible alternative reinforcer: social interaction. The study compared the effects of preferred tangible and social reinforcers on skill acquisition, stereotyped behavior, and task engagement during the instruction period in three children, 3-8 years of age, with ASDs. This study had two phases: in the first phase, preference assessments and reinforcer assessments were conducted to identify the most highly preferred items and relative preferred type of reinforcers. In the second phase, teachers taught the target skills using two different reinforcers and the three dependent variables were compared between two reinforcer conditions. The results suggest that the reinforcers were equally effective; however tangible reinforcers resulted in high levels of stereotyped behavior. The results indicate that social reinforcers can be efficient reinforcers for the population. The study discussed making an efficient reinforcement decision for individuals with ASD.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.007