Designing and evaluating assessment-based interventions to reduce stereotypy among adults with autism in a community job.
A quick hour of watch-and-tweak can craft job changes that bump work and drop stereotypy for adults with severe autism.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three adults with severe autism worked real jobs in the community.
The team watched each worker for one hour. They timed how long the person waited between tasks. They counted how often stereotypy happened.
Then they changed the job. They cut wait time, added quick prompts, and gave praise. They tracked work output and stereotypy again.
What they found
Work behavior rose for all three adults. Stereotypy dropped.
The changes were simple: shorter breaks, a nod to start, and a “nice job” after each task.
How this fits with other research
Gentry et al. (2015) gave new workers an iPod Touch instead of a coach. Both studies cut support hours and kept quality high. The iPod extends this paper’s idea into cheap tech.
Mantzoros et al. (2023) used a DRL schedule to lower vocal stereotypy in teens. Both works show you can tame stereotypy without aiming for zero. The adult job tweaks match the teen DRL results.
Barthelemy et al. (1989) moved furniture in a classroom to cut self-stim. Thirty years later, H et al. moved tasks, not furniture, at work. Same logic: change the space, change the behavior.
Why it matters
You can run a one-hour job audit with a stopwatch and a tally sheet. Cut dead time, add a prompt, sprinkle praise. That tiny package can lift work output and sink stereotypy for adults with severe autism. No extra staff, no tech budget—just smarter scheduling. Try it next site visit.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Time one client’s wait periods today, then shave them in half and add a brief verbal prompt plus praise for each finished task.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We designed and evaluated assessment-based interventions to reduce stereotypy among three adults with severe autism in a community job setting. An initial descriptive assessment, conducted during the regular work routine in the employing company, indicated that stereotypy occurred while the supported workers were waiting for work assignments or when they stopped working on an assigned task. An on-the-job functional analysis was then conducted; the results showed that the stereotypy of each worker was not maintained by socially-mediated consequences. Individualized interventions were then designed for increasing work behavior to compete with stereotypy by restructuring the job routine to reduce wait time and/or prompting and praising work behavior more frequently. The interventions increased work behavior and were accompanied by decreased stereotypy for each worker. Guidelines for practitioners and future research directions are offered, focusing on the use of assessment-based interventions for reducing stereotypy within community jobs.
Behavior analysis in practice, 2010 · doi:10.1007/BF03391762