Comprehensive synthesis of early intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism based on the UCLA young autism project model.
Lovaas-style EIBI works on average, but kids differ — monitor progress early and plan for upkeep.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Reichow et al. (2009) pooled every published trial that copied the UCLA Young Autism Project.
They asked: does 25-40 hours a week of one-to-one ABA raise IQ and daily-living scores for preschoolers with autism?
The team used meta-analysis to average results across all qualifying studies.
What they found
The overall answer was yes — EIBI produced meaningful gains on average.
Kids varied widely: some shot up 30 points, some barely budged.
The paper warns that you must watch each child and adjust the program.
How this fits with other research
Rodgers et al. (2021) updated the same question with finer data. Their 2021 individual-kid meta-analysis shows smaller, but still real, IQ and adaptive gains.
Reichow (2012) looked at five later meta-analyses and found the same medium effect — the signal holds.
Kovshoff et al. (2011) extends the story: without a maintenance plan, most gains fade within two years after EIBI stops.
Why it matters
Start EIBI early, but do not treat it as a one-time fix. Use the first six months to test if the child is moving; if not, tweak intensity, goals, or parent training. Build a hand-off plan before you fade hours so skills stick.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Graph each client’s baseline-to-6-month Vineland and IQ scores; if slope is flat, call a team meeting to adjust targets or add parent coaching.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A 3-part comprehensive synthesis of the early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism based on the University of California at Los Angeles Young Autism Project method (Lovaas in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3-9, 1987) is presented. The three components of the synthesis were: (a) descriptive analyses, (b) effect size analyses, and (c) a meta-analysis. The findings suggest EIBI is an effective treatment, on average, for children with autism. The conditions under which this finding applies and the limitations and cautions that must be taken when interpreting the results are discussed within the contextual findings of the moderator analyses conducted in the meta-analysis.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009 · doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0596-0