Communication deficits and avoidance of angry faces in children with autism spectrum disorder.
Autistic kids who dodge angry faces also score lower on social communication, and the pattern holds from preschool to adulthood.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team compared autistic children with typical peers. All kids had normal language and IQ scores.
Each child saw faces on a screen. The faces showed anger, happiness, or neutral looks. Eye trackers measured how long kids looked away from angry faces.
Parents also filled out a social-communication checklist.
What they found
Autistic kids looked away from angry faces longer than typical kids. The longer they avoided, the lower their social-communication scores.
Happy and neutral faces did not show this pattern.
How this fits with other research
Faso et al. (2016) found the same pattern in adults. Autistic adults were slower to spot angry faces in a crowd. Together the studies show angry-face avoidance starts in childhood and lasts into adulthood.
Pan et al. (2025) looked at even younger kids. Preschoolers with autism showed flat heart-rate and less eye contact during social cartoons. Ana’s school-age sample fits between these ages, building a timeline of growing social-attention gaps.
Root et al. (2017) seems to disagree. They reported autistic kids mislabel soft angry faces but handle clear anger fine. The difference is task: Ana measured quick eye movements; R measured naming accuracy. Kids avoid what they can still name.
Why it matters
If a learner looks away from angry faces, he misses cues that help him stay safe and keep friends. You can teach him to glance back using brief “check the face” prompts and differential reinforcement. Start with low-intensity faces and reinforce quick looks. Over time, fade prompts and add real faces. Track social-communication gains to see if the skill transfers to the playground.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Flash one calm angry face card, prompt a one-second look, and deliver praise or tokens for compliance.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding how emotional faces are processed is important to help characterize the social deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). AIMS: We examined: (i) whether attention is modulated by emotional facial expression; (ii) the time course of the attentional preferences (short vs. long stimulus presentation rates); and (iii) the association between attentional biases and autistic symptomatology. METHOD AND PROCEDURES: We applied a dot-probe experiment with emotional faces (happy, sad, and angry). The sample was composed of ASD children without additional language and/or intellectual impairments (n=29) and age-matched Typically Developing (TD) children (n=29). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: When compared to the TD group, the ASD group showed an attentional bias away from angry faces at long presentation rates. No differences between groups were found for happy or sad faces. Furthermore, correlational analyses showed that the higher avoidance of angry faces, the greater are the social communication difficulties of ASD children. The attentional bias away from angry faces may be an underlying mechanism of social dysfunction in ASD. We discuss the implications of these findings for current theories of emotional processing in ASD.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.02.002