Cohesive discourse in pervasive developmental disorders.
Autistic speakers often reference the physical room instead of the prior conversational turn, giving you a clear, teachable cohesion target.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team compared how people with autism talk during free conversation.
They looked at higher-functioning autistic speakers, Asperger speakers, and typical speakers.
Each person chatted with an adult. Later the team counted how often each speaker linked back to the partner’s last turn.
What they found
Autistic speakers used fewer links that tied back to the partner’s words.
They talked more about objects or events in the room instead.
Asperger speakers only slipped when they used unclear “he,” “it,” or “that.”
How this fits with other research
Hobson et al. (2012) saw the same gap and called it weak “cognitive linkage.”
Losh et al. (2003) and McCabe et al. (2013) later found the same weakness inside personal stories, showing the trouble lasts from childhood to adulthood.
Mulder et al. (2020) seems to disagree: autistic kids told witness stories that were just as coherent as typical peers. The task, however, was highly structured. Free chat exposes the gap; tight questions hide it.
Why it matters
When a client seems “off topic,” check if he is describing the room instead of building on your last line. Teach him to echo key words you just said before adding new info. Start with scripted play or interview games, then fade the script. This one move can raise reciprocity without heavy language drills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →During conversation practice, prompt the learner to repeat one word from your last sentence before he adds his own idea, then reinforce the linkage.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Investigated the use of cohesive links to create a reciprocal conversation in individuals with autism, Asperger syndrome, and a control group of children and adolescents with nonspecific social problems. All subjects engaged in a 10-minute conversation with an examiner that touched on various topics. The conversation was audiotaped, transcribed, and coded blindly for several types of cohesive links. Compared to controls, the higher functioning autistic group referred less to a previous stretch of the conversation and more to an aspect of the physical environment. The Asperger group, on the other hand, was very similar to the controls except they made more unclear references that were difficult to interpret. Implications of these findings for understanding the communicative failure of subjects with pervasive developmental disorder are discussed.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1994 · doi:10.1007/BF02172230