Co-occurring Conditions and Quality of Life in Autistic Children Attending General Education or Special Education Schools.
School setting mirrors medical complexity but not a child’s own happiness score.
01Research in Context
What this study did
van den Helder et al. (2025) compared autistic children in two school worlds: general-education classrooms and separate special-education schools. They looked at how many extra conditions each child had, such as ADHD, anxiety, or language delays. They also asked the kids how they felt about their own lives using a simple quality-of-life survey.
What they found
Kids in special-ed schools carried heavier baggage: more behavior, mood, and learning problems on average. Yet when the children rated how good life felt, both groups gave almost the same scores. Over time, language and hyperactivity issues shrank a little, but behavior problems inched upward for everyone.
How this fits with other research
Melegari et al. (2025) extends these results to caregivers. They show that while the children’s own ratings stay steady, moms and dads feel the pain: sleep battles in young kids and conduct issues in teens drag caregiver quality of life down.
Kuhlthau et al. (2010) and Potvin et al. (2015) warned us earlier that behavior problems, not autism itself, drive lower quality-of-life scores. Chantal’s team now adds the twist: placement severity tracks with the number of extra diagnoses but still does not dent the child’s personal life-satisfaction score.
Ilan et al. (2021) seems to disagree at first glance. That study found little difference between preschoolers in mainstream or special-ed settings. The key difference is age: Michal looked at 1- to 5-year-olds where placement decisions are still fluid, while Chantal studied older children where settings have already sorted by support need.
Why it matters
For you in the classroom or clinic, this means: don’t assume a child in a self-contained program feels worse than a peer in inclusion. Ask the child directly; their answer may surprise you. Use that feedback to pick targets. Work first on the co-occurring behaviors that flare most—sleep, anxiety, or aggression—because those are the levers that lift both child and family well-being, no matter where the IEP meeting sits.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a child-friendly quality-of-life question to your intake and review it each quarter.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A majority of children with autism is diagnosed with one or more co-occurring mental health conditions. We aimed to explore how co-occurring conditions and Quality of Life differ between school types (general education vs. special education schools), and whether co-occurring conditions were subject to the same trends over time for the two school types. Secondary, we aimed to analyze associations with child characteristics. Repeated cross- sectional data from 2013 to 2022 on children with autism (N = 1534,aged 5-15 years) in the Netherlands were used. Across school types, we showed a decrease in externalizing and language-learning conditions over time. Language-learning conditions became more concentrated in special education schools. Hyperactivity-inattention difficulties remained stable, emotional difficulties decreased and behavioral difficulties increased. Compared to those in general education, children in special education schools faced more behavioral and hyperactivity-inattention challenges. School type, duration of the study, externalizing, internalizing and language-learning conditions were all unrelated to QoL. Autistic girls experienced more behavioral difficulties compared to boys with autism. In conclusion, children with autism in special education schools experience similar QoL, but have more (severe) co-occurring conditions than those attending general education.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2592-5