Autism & Developmental

Children with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior using chin movements to operate microswitches to obtain environmental stimulation.

Lancioni et al. (2006) · Research in developmental disabilities 2006
★ The Verdict

A chin-switch linked to fun sensory items can teach minimally motoric kids that their own movement matters.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with students who have severe motor limits and multiple disabilities.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only verbal clients with full hand use.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Two children with many disabilities and almost no movement learned to hit a chin-switch. The switch was the size of a large button and sat under their chin.

Each press turned on lights, music, or a fan for 10 seconds. The team used an ABAB design: baseline, chin-switch, baseline again, then chin-switch again.

Sessions happened at the children’s desks during school. No extra prompts were given. The goal was simple: let the kids pick their own sensory fun.

02

What they found

Both kids quickly learned to tap the switch with their chin. Their chin hits jumped every time the switch was turned on.

When the switch was taken away, the hits stopped. When it came back, the hits returned. Two months later, both kids still used the switch on their own.

03

How this fits with other research

Lancioni et al. (2009) ran the same idea but taught hand and back presses instead of chin taps. Both studies got the same jump in responding, showing the body part does not matter as long as the toy turns on.

Lancioni et al. (2008) added a VOCA box so kids could ask for “Hi” after they got music. Their kids learned both tricks, proving one switch can grow into real communication.

Stasolla et al. (2015) moved the setup into a regular classroom. Six kids with cerebral palsy used a laptop plus switch to pick letters and math games. The chin-switch study opened the door; Fabrizio walked it into class time.

04

Why it matters

If a child can move only one body part, you can still give control of the world. Tape a switch where that part can hit it, link it to a radio or bubble machine, and watch the child learn cause-and-effect. Start with one toy, then add more toys, or even a voice output step. The whole chain—motor, sensory, social—can start with a single chin tap.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Place a sensitive microswitch under the student’s chin, plug it into a battery toy they like, and count chin hits for five minutes.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
2
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

In these two studies, two children with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior were assessed to see if they could use chin movements to operate microswitches to obtain environmental stimulation. In Study I, we applied an adapted version of a recently introduced electronic microswitch [Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Baccani, S., et al. (2004). Technological aids to promote basic developmental achievements by children with multiple disabilities: evaluating two cases. Cognitive Processing 5, 232-238]. In Study II, we set up a new microswitch detecting the chin-movement response through an optic sensor. Each study was carried out according to an ABAB sequence in which A represented baseline and B intervention phases. A 2-month post-intervention check also occurred. The data showed that both children increased the frequency of the chin response, thus increasing the level of environmental stimulation, during the intervention phases. This performance was retained at the post-intervention check. The overall suitability of this response and related microswitches as well as the need to explore other potential responses and microswitches for children with minimal motor behavior is discussed.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2006 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.02.003