Children with developmental disabilities experience higher levels of adversity.
Children with developmental disabilities live through markedly more adverse events, so screen for ACEs and weave trauma-informed tactics into every behavior plan.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Titlestad et al. (2019) compared family stress in two groups of children. One group had developmental disabilities. The other group had typical development.
The team used a quasi-experimental design. They counted how many adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs, each child faced.
What they found
Kids with developmental disabilities met 28–60% more ACEs than their peers. These events include abuse, neglect, or household chaos.
The study shows that disability and adversity often overlap. The risk is not small; it is markedly higher.
How this fits with other research
Stephens et al. (2018) extends the same idea into autism care. They found that children with one or more ACEs wait 17–27% longer for diagnosis and therapy. The message is clear: adversity delays help.
Enav et al. (2020) sharpen the picture. They tracked suspected maltreatment reports in Israeli clinics. Kids with developmental disabilities were flagged six times more often. The Titlestad et al. (2019) count of ACEs now feels even more urgent.
Kuenzel et al. (2021) add a ray of hope. They show that positive parenting cuts the number of new ACEs in families of children with ASD. The same high risk seen in Titlestad et al. (2019) can be lowered with parent support.
Why it matters
You already screen for language, play, and daily living skills. Add a short ACEs checklist at intake. If the count is high, build extra rapport with caregivers and choose trauma-ready strategies like clear warnings, choice, and calm transitions. The data say these kids face more chaos; your plan can be the buffer.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add the 10-item ACEs screener to your intake packet; review results before writing the behavior plan.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with developmental disabilities (DD) experience significant health disparities. An overlooked risk factor for health disparities in the DD population is adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). The purpose of this study was to generate population prevalence data about level of adverse experiences among children with DD in comparison to children without DD and the extent to which potential confounders may influence observed associations between adversity and child DD status. METHODS: Data from the 2011-12 National Survey of Child Health (NSCH) were analyzed to estimate prevalence of adversity among families of children with and without DD, age 3-17 years (N = 62,428; DD = 2622). Level of adversity was assessed via parent response to the Adverse Family Experiences questionnaire. Bivariate and multinomial logistic regressions were utilized to investigate the relationship between adverse family experiences (AFEs) and child DD status, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Child DD status was significantly and independently associated with higher probability of reporting 1-2 AFEs (RRR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.06, 1.5) and 3+ AFEs (RRR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.16, 2.21). CONCLUSION: This study documents significant disparities in adversity among children with DD using a population-based sample. These adversities potentially compromise successful transition to adulthood and overall health outcomes.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2019 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2019.03.011