Autism & Developmental

Autistic and autism community perspectives on infant and family support in the first two years of life: Findings from a community consultation survey

Anonymous (2024) · Autism 2024
★ The Verdict

Autistic and family stakeholders want parent coaching and sensory tweaks for babies—without the word 'intervention' or any effort to suppress autistic traits.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who coach families of infants or toddlers awaiting or newly given an autism evaluation.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose caseload is only school-age or adult clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team ran an online survey. Autistic adults, parents, and professionals gave their views.

They asked what help families want in the first two years of life. They also asked which words feel respectful.

02

What they found

People want parent coaching before any diagnosis. They like the word 'support' and dislike 'intervention.'

They want tips that keep baby autonomy. They do not want traits like hand-flapping stopped.

03

How this fits with other research

Fletcher-Watson et al. (2017) asked the same questions in Europe. Both studies agree: drop 'at-risk' labels and use neutral words.

Zhu et al. (2026) show how to do it. Their team found government cash, caregiver training, and tele-coach apps let towns offer the very-early, autonomy-friendly help the survey wants.

Pye et al. (2024) map real-world use in Australia. After reform, preschoolers get two services on average, but the paper proves access still depends on income and postcode. The new survey pushes us to start that support even earlier and fairer.

04

Why it matters

You can act now. Swap 'early intervention' for 'family support' in flyers and IFSPs. Offer parent coaching that teaches environmental tweaks—dim lights, accept stimming—instead of direct infant drills. Push funders for pre-diagnosis dollars so families get help while they wait. These small language and timing shifts line your practice up with what the autism community actually wants.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Change your intake flyer from 'Early Intervention Program' to 'Family Support for Babies' and add a box parents can tick for lighting, noise, and routine accommodations.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
238
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Emerging evidence suggests parenting supports implemented in the first 2 years of life may influence developmental outcomes for infants more likely to be Autistic. Yet questions remain about acceptability of these supports to the Autistic and autism communities. Through mixed-methods participatory research – co-designed and produced by Autistic and non-Autistic researchers – we sought diverse community perspectives on this topic, including to understand the relative acceptability of different support options. A total of 238 participants completed our online survey: 128 Autistic and 110 non-Autistic respondents, some of whom also self-identified as parents of Autistic, otherwise neurodivergent, and/or neurotypical children, and/or as health/education professionals and/or researchers. Most participants agreed that very-early-in-life approaches should help parents understand and support their children, and disagreed that these should seek to suppress autistic behaviour. Most agreed with the goal of respecting infant autonomy, and that parent education towards creating sensitive, accommodating environments could be appropriate, albeit with nuanced differences-of-opinion regarding the acceptability of specific therapeutic approaches. Participants generally endorsed the terms ‘support’ (vs ‘intervention’) and ‘early-in-life’ (vs ‘at-risk’/‘pre-emptive’). Engaging equal-power partnerships for the development, delivery of, and discourse around early-in-life autism supports will ensure end-user community values and needs are respected. Most support programmes for Autistic children are available only after they are diagnosed. Research suggests that parenting supports may be helpful for parents and their infants, when provided in the first 2 years of life – before a formal diagnosis is given, but when information suggests an infant is more likely to be Autistic. However, we do not know how acceptable these types of supports might be to the Autistic and autism communities. We asked 238 Autistic and non-autistic people – some of whom were parents, and some of whom were professionals working in research, health and education – about their perspectives on very-early supports. People generally agreed that it could be acceptable to work with parents to help them understand and support their child’s specific needs and unique ways of communicating. People suggested a variety of support strategies could be acceptable, including parent education, changing the environment to meet an infant’s needs, and creating opportunities for infants’ to make choices and exercise control. People preferred respectful and accurate language – including the term ‘support’ (rather than ‘intervention’) and ‘early-in-life’ (rather than ‘at-risk’ of autism, or ‘pre-emptive’ when describing developmental stage). Continuing to work with community members will help to make sure autism support programmes are relevant and helpful.

Autism, 2024 · doi:10.1177/13623613241262077