Atypical gaze following in autism: a comparison of three potential mechanisms.
Autistic preschoolers show a lasting, specific weakness in reflexive gaze following that is not explained by slower development alone.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team watched 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic preschoolers. All kids sat at a screen. A face on the left or right looked to a toy. Cameras tracked where the child looked next.
They tested three ideas: Do autistic kids miss the look because they ignore faces, because they can't shift eyes fast, or because the reflex itself is weak?
What they found
Only one idea fit the data. Autistic kids looked at the face just as long, but they were slower to follow its gaze. Their word learning from gaze matched their developmental age, not their diagnosis.
In short, the reflex to follow a gaze cue is weak, not just delayed.
How this fits with other research
Muth et al. (2014) saw the same slow gaze in older kids. They showed that after watching two adults make eye contact, typical kids speed up their gaze following, but autistic kids do not. Together the two papers say the problem is not speed alone; autistic children miss the social meaning of eye contact.
Spriggs et al. (2015) looked even younger. Babies later diagnosed with autism started out looking at eyes, then lost interest and never got it back. Bigham et al. (2013) shows the gap is still there at preschool, so the atypical path is long-lasting.
Geurts et al. (2008) used home videos and found gaze and affect problems at 6 months. The lab data now confirm parents' early reports with precise eye-tracking.
Why it matters
Do not assume a preschooler who can name objects will follow your gaze. Check reflexive gaze in your assessment battery. If it is weak, teach attention to faces first, then pair gaze with words. Use brief trials and clear head turns. Track progress with eye-tracking or simple video; change the program when gaze following improves, not just when vocabulary grows.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one probe trial: hold a toy at eye level, look at a second toy, and record if the child follows your gaze within two seconds.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In order to evaluate the following potential mechanisms underlying atypical gaze following in autism, impaired reflexive gaze following, difficulty integrating gaze and affect, or reduced understanding of the referential significance of gaze, we administered three paradigms to young children with autism (N = 21) and chronological (N = 21) and nonverbal mental age (N = 21) matched controls. Children with autism exhibited impaired reflexive gaze following. The absence of evidence of integration of gaze and affect, regardless of diagnosis, indicates ineffective measurement of this construct. Reduced gaze following was apparent among children with autism during eye-tracking and in-person assessments. Word learning from gaze cues was better explained by developmental level than autism. Thus, gaze following may traverse an atypical, rather than just delayed, trajectory in autism.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013 · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1818-7