Autism & Developmental

Attentional Learning Helps Language Acquisition Take Shape for Atypically Developing Children, Not Just Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Field et al. (2016) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2016
★ The Verdict

Shape-based word learning needs clear naming cues for kids with autism and low verbal mental age.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching early language to preschool and early-elementary children with ASD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with older, fluent verbal clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Koenen et al. (2016) watched how kids learn new object names.

They tested three groups: typically developing kids, kids with developmental delay, and kids with autism.

Each child saw toys that matched either shape or color.

Sometimes the toys were named out loud; sometimes they stayed quiet.

The team wanted to know who would pick new toys by shape alone.

02

What they found

Typical kids used shape no matter what.

Kids with developmental delay or high verbal-mental-age autism only used shape when the toy was named.

Kids with low verbal-mental-age autism never used shape.

In short, naming helps some kids notice shape; others still miss it.

03

How this fits with other research

Georgiou (2023) extends these findings.

That study showed weak early brain reactions to speech sounds explain why many autistic kids have lower verbal than non-verbal scores.

Together, the two papers say: attention to speech matters, and when it is weak, word-learning tricks like shape bias may not appear.

Marsack et al. (2017) adds that auditory attention in autism is "leaky"—kids react to sounds from the wrong direction.

This diffuse attention could be why naming cues help only for kids with stronger verbal skills; they can still catch the word even if attention drifts.

04

Why it matters

Check verbal mental age before you teach new words through shape games.

If it is low, do not wait for the child to discover the rule.

Instead, name every new item clearly and pair the shape with the label.

For higher-verbal kids, naming is still useful but you can fade it faster.

This small shift can save trials and cut frustration on both sides.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

When you present a new object, say its name aloud and point to its shape—do not assume the child will pick up the rule alone.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

The shape bias-generalising labels to same shaped objects-has been linked to attentional learning or referential intent. We explore these origins in children with typical development (TD), autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other developmental disorders (DD). In two conditions, a novel object was presented and either named or described. Children selected another from a shape, colour or texture match. TD children choose the shape match in both conditions, children with DD and 'high-verbal mental age' (VMA) children with ASD (language age > 4.6) did so in the name condition and 'low-VMA' children with ASD never showed the heuristic. Thus, the shape bias arises from attentional learning in atypically developing children and is delayed in ASD.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016 · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2401-1