Autism & Developmental

A hierarchical analysis of patterns of noncompliance in autistic and behavior-disturbed children.

Volkmar et al. (1982) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1982
★ The Verdict

Ask autistic kids to do, not to say—compliance jumps when the request is verbal but the response can be a gesture or action.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write task analyses or run compliance programs in clinic or classroom.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only with fully conversational teens who already follow multi-step directions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team re-examined old compliance data from autistic and behavior-disturbed children. They wanted to see if some kinds of adult requests are easier to follow than others.

Three request types were stacked from easiest to hardest: (1) say something when asked to say something, (2) do something when asked with a gesture, (3) do something when asked with words.

02

What they found

The same rank order showed up every time. Kids were most willing to act on a verbal request that needed a non-verbal action. They were least willing to answer a verbal question that needed a spoken reply.

The pattern held for both autistic and non-autistic children with behavior problems.

03

How this fits with other research

Whitehouse et al. (2014) built on this idea. They used TEACCH steps that match the easiest request type—tell the child verbally to open mouth, hand over toothbrush, etc.—and got full dental compliance without sedation.

Morris et al. (2021) remind us that most later studies forget to report how they asked for assent. The 1982 ladder gives a ready-made script: start with 'please hand me the toy' before asking 'do you want to play?'

McLennan et al. (2008) look at the flip side—oppositional traits. Their data fit the ladder: kids labeled ODD still followed non-verbal requests more often than verbal ones, showing the hierarchy is about request style, not just defiance.

04

Why it matters

Next time a client ignores your question, switch the format. Ask for an action first, not a spoken answer. You will test the 1982 finding and may cut problem behavior before it starts.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Change one instruction from 'What color is this?' to 'Point to the red car' and record if the client complies faster.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
27
Population
autism spectrum disorder, mixed clinical, neurotypical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

A reanalysis of data from an experimental study of autistic negativism is presented. Subjects were autistic, behavior-disturbed, or normal and ranged in age from 5 to 12 years. There were nine subjects per group. Experimental conditions consisted of a verbal request for a verbal response, a nonverbal request for a nonverbal response, and a verbal request for a nonverbal response. Data were reanalyzed by dichotomizing subjects as either compliant or noncompliant on the basis of the number of correct responses; scalogram analysis was then performed on the dichotomized data. The children's responses to the messages formed a cumulative, unidimensional hierarchy based on the individual patterns of responses, with verbal requests for verbal responses eliciting the least compliance and verbal requests for nonverbal responses the most. Implications of the hierarchy for a developmental theory of autistic negativism and the relationship of task demands to compliance are discussed.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1982 · doi:10.1007/BF01531672