Assessment & Research

What am I doing in Timbuktu: person-environment picture recognition for persons with intellectual disability.

Danielsson et al. (2006) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2006
★ The Verdict

Match self to familiar places and others to new places to make photos easier to name for people with ID.

✓ Read this if BCBAs picking photos for AAC or choice boards for teens or adults with moderate to severe ID.
✗ Skip if Practitioners already using line drawings only or working with verbal clients who read text labels.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team showed photos to people with intellectual disability. Some photos showed the person in a place they knew. Others showed the person in a strange place. They also showed photos of other people in both places.

They asked who was in each picture. They wanted to see which mix of person and place was easiest to name.

02

What they found

People named themselves fastest when they stood in a familiar spot. They also named friends fastest when the friend stood in a new spot. The level of disability did not change this pattern.

Recognition was worst when self appeared in a strange place or when a friend appeared in a well-known place.

03

How this fits with other research

McCann (1981) cut the background out of photos. That trick helped teens with severe ID match photos to real objects. H et al. kept the full scene but swapped who was in it. Both studies say the same thing: control what surrounds the face.

Gutierrez et al. (1998) found line drawings beat photos for quick matching. H et al. show photos still work if you pair them right. Use drawings for speed; use photos for rich context.

Roche et al. (1997) saw many adults could not choose from pictures at all. H et al. give a fix: start with self-plus-familiar-place photos. That pair gives the strongest recognition boost.

04

Why it matters

When you build an AAC book, put the learner’s own photo in places they know—home, classroom, lunch table. Put photos of staff or peers in new spots like the zoo or clinic. This simple swap can cut teaching time and reduce frustration during early phases.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open the AAC app and move the learner’s selfie onto the ‘home’ page; put staff photos on the ‘community’ page.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
45
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of familiarity of depicted persons and environments in recognition of photographs for pupils with different degrees of intellectual disability (ID). METHOD: Forty-five pupils with ID participated. RESULTS: An interaction effect between the two variables, person and environment, was found in addition to main effects for both the variables. Pictures of the test person himself or herself in familiar environments were easier to recognize than in unfamiliar environments, whereas the opposite was found for pictures of other familiar persons. No interaction effects of degree of ID were found. CONCLUSIONS: The interaction pattern is explained in terms of absent, present or implausible semantic associations between the person and the environmental context. The results are discussed in relation to augmentative and alternative communication with photographs.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2006 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00766.x