Assessment & Research

Utilitarian Attention by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder on a Filtering Task.

Brodeur et al. (2018) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2018
★ The Verdict

Kids with autism can out-speed typical peers when target and distractors are close and flash in quick succession.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running discrete trials or table-top programs with children who have ASD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with adults or using wide-spaced visual arrays.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers asked the kids with autism and 20 typical kids to press a button when a target shape appeared on a screen. Flanker shapes sat right next to the target or farther away. The team varied how soon the flankers popped up before the target. Eye trackers recorded every millisecond.

The task tested “utilitarian attention” — the speed kids filter out nearby junk to spot the real target.

02

What they found

When flankers were close and appeared only 100 ms before the target, kids with autism hit the button faster than typical peers. The gap was tiny — about 40 ms — but it showed up for every child with ASD. When flankers were far away or timed earlier, both groups matched speeds.

03

How this fits with other research

Miller et al. (2014) saw the opposite: kids with autism were slower on every visual task they tried. The clash looks real, but the jobs differed. Louisa used hard detection and memory games; A et al. used a simple flanker test with tight spacing. Short, close distractors may trigger a fast “block-it” reflex in autism that longer, messy tasks do not.

Sisson et al. (1993) first reported slower visual orienting in high-functioning adults with autism. The new kid data do not erase the old adult finding; they add a rule — when distractors hug the target and time is ultra-short, the ASD brain can flip from slow to speedy.

De Meo-Monteil et al. (2019) found adults with autism out-paced typical adults on visual-motor timing. Both studies spotlight a visual edge in autism that appears only under specific, millisecond-level conditions.

04

Why it matters

Check your table setup. If flash cards or icons almost touch, the child with autism may process them faster than you expect. Keep instruction pace brisk, not cautious. But if materials are spaced out or the child must also remember or describe what she saw, give extra time — Louisa’s wide-gap tasks still matter. One size does not fit all; distance and timing decide which brain mode kicks in.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Slide your target card and distractor card 1 cm apart and present them almost together — watch if the child responds faster; if so, quicken your trial pace.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
autism spectrum disorder, neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

The findings are evidence that persons with ASD benefit more than typically developing (TD) persons from spatial framing cues in focusing their attention on a visual target. Participants were administered a forced-choice task to assess visual filtering. A target stimulus was presented on a screen and flanker stimuli were presented simultaneously with or after the target, with varying stimuli onset asynchronies (SOAs). Regardless of SOA, TD children showed the expected distracting effects with slower reaction times (RTs) when flankers were at closer distances from the target. However, children with ASD displayed shorter RTs in the conditions in which the stimuli were presented simultaneously or with a short SOA. These findings are interpreted as reflecting utilitarian attention among children with ASD.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2018 · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3619-5