Assessment & Research

Underwater audiogram of the California sea lion by the conditioned vocalization technique.

Schusterman et al. (1972) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1972
★ The Verdict

A sea lion earned fish for barking at underwater tones, giving the first full map of its hearing range and showing that conditioned vocalization is a fast hearing test.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess hearing or train auditory responses in clients with limited verbal skills.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only working with fully verbal adults who self-report hearing loss.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers taught a California sea lion to bark under water when it heard a tone.

Each correct bark earned fish. By raising and lowering tone loudness they mapped the animal’s full hearing range.

The method gave the first complete underwater audiogram for this species.

02

What they found

The sea lion heard best between 1 and 28 kHz, peaking at 16 kHz.

It could still detect sounds all the way up to 192 kHz.

Conditioned vocalization worked as a fast, reliable hearing test.

03

How this fits with other research

Jones et al. (1992) used the same pure-tone method with Down-syndrome teens and found poorer high-frequency hearing than peers. Both studies show the technique gives clear thresholds across very different subjects.

Fox et al. (2001) later taught sea lions to form equivalence classes using class-specific fish. Together the papers prove the same animals can serve both basic sensory and higher-order cognition work, strengthening marine lab programs.

Neves et al. (2018) used equivalence-based drills to improve sentence production in children with cochlear implants. The sea-lion vocal method underpins the hearing data that guide such implant mappings, linking basic audiogram work to clinical language gains.

04

Why it matters

You now have proof that a simple bark-for-tone procedure yields accurate thresholds. When you need a quick hearing check for non-verbal clients—whether they bark, press a switch, or sign—reinforce a clear, discrete response and sweep tones the same way. The study also reminds us that operant methods work across species; if a sea lion can learn the task, your learner can too.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one clear response your client can already do—press, clap, or sign—and reinforce it only when a tone sounds; begin sweeping tone loudness to find the quietest level they still detect.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Conditioning techniques were developed demonstrating that pure tone frequencies under water can exert nearly perfect control over the underwater click vocalizations of the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Conditioned vocalizations proved to be a reliable way of obtaining underwater sound detection thresholds in Zalophus at 13 different frequencies, covering a frequency range of 250 to 64,000 Hz. The audiogram generated by these threshold measurements suggests that under water, the range of maximal sensitivity for Zalophus lies between one and 28 kHz with best sensitivity at 16 kHz. Between 28 and 36 kHz there is a loss in sensitivity of 60 dB/octave. However, with relatively intense acoustic signals (> 38 dB re 1 mub underwater), Zalophus will respond to frequencies at least as high as 192 kHz. These results are compared with the underwater hearing of other marine mammals.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-339