Assessment & Research

Time perception in children treated for a cerebellar medulloblastoma.

Droit-Volet et al. (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

After cerebellar tumor surgery, kids struggle to reproduce brief time intervals (≤1 s), likely due to slower processing speed rather than a pure timing deficit.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with school-age survivors of cerebellar medulloblastoma in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving only ASD or adult populations without acquired brain injury.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Droit-Volet et al. (2013) asked kids who had cerebellar tumor surgery to copy short beeps. The kids heard a tone lasting one second or less, waited a bit, then pressed a button to match the length.

The team compared these children to healthy peers. They also ran a second test where kids judged which of two tones was longer.

02

What they found

The tumor group pressed too short or too long. Their timing was more scattered, especially on sub-second tones. On the pick-the-longer-tone task, both groups scored the same.

The authors say the problem is not a broken inner clock. It looks like slower brain speed after surgery.

03

How this fits with other research

Provasi et al. (2014) studied the same children one year later. They found the kids could hear rhythm fine but tapped along slowly and unevenly. Practice helped a little, showing the deficit is partly trainable.

Kaufman et al. (2010) gave adults with autism the same copy-the-tone task. Those adults also under-shot longer tones, yet the cerebellar kids mostly miss short ones. The method matches, but the error pattern differs by group and duration.

Freschl et al. (2021) report that toddlers with autism actually process rapid visual flashes faster than peers. This seems opposite to the slowed timing seen after cerebellar surgery. The key difference is brain site: cerebellar damage slows output, while autism here speeds input.

04

Why it matters

If you work with a child post-cerebellar tumor, do not assume they feel one second the same way you do. Give extra wait time before prompting the next response. Use clear start and stop signals instead of relying on their inner count. When you track data, separate accuracy from speed; both can move with practice.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add an extra one-second pause after your instruction before you prompt a response.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate temporal abilities in children treated by surgery for a malignant tumor in the cerebellum. Children with a diagnosed medulloblastoma and age-paired control children were given a temporal discrimination task (bisection task) and a temporal reproduction task with two duration ranges, one shorter than 1s and the other longer than 4s. The motor and cognitive capacities of these children were also assessed by a battery of age-adapted neuropsychological tests. The results did not show any significant difference in performance between the children with or without cerebellar lesions in the temporal discrimination task. It was only in the temporal reproduction task that the children with cerebellar lesions reproduced longer and more variable durations than the other children, but only for the short stimulus durations (≤ 1 s). In addition, a hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the best predictor of variance in temporal performance was a significantly lower processing speed in children with cerebellar lesions in comparison to their controls. These results indicated that the major cause of deficits in temporal judgments in children with cerebellar lesions was due to their inability to reproduce accurately short temporal intervals in association with low processing speed, rather than to a specific deficit in the perception of time.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.006