The treatment of men with a learning disability convicted of exhibitionism.
Cognitive sessions can cut “flashing is fun” thoughts in men with ID, but victim-blame beliefs need longer work.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four men with learning disabilities had been convicted of exhibitionism.
The team gave them weekly cognitive treatment.
Sessions challenged beliefs like “flashing is harmless fun.”
Staff tracked how thoughts changed over time.
What they found
All four men showed gains.
The idea that exposure is fun or harmless dropped the most.
Beliefs that “the victim shares blame” were harder to shift.
Victim-responsibility thoughts lingered even after treatment ended.
How this fits with other research
Tonnsen et al. (2016) later used similar CBT for aggression in detained adults with ID.
They also saw drops in harmful acts, showing the same method works across problem behaviours.
Xenitidis et al. (2010) looked at sexualised challenging behaviour in ID and found higher sexual knowledge, not less.
That finding questions the old “counterfeit-deviance” idea that clients offend because they simply don’t know better.
Together the papers suggest: teach new thoughts, but also teach relationship skills.
Why it matters
You can borrow the belief-challenge scripts for any sexual or rule-breaking behaviour.
Start by targeting the “harmless fun” idea first; it changes fastest.
Plan extra practice for victim-blame statements—they need more reps.
If your client knows plenty about sex yet still offends, add intimacy-skills training instead of more sex-ed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one 10-minute belief-challenge drill to your next session: ask the client to list three consequences of flashing and role-play telling a friend why it hurts victims.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This paper reviews work on the treatment of men convicted of exhibitionism or indecent exposure. Recidivism is extremely high after treatments, with true figures on recidivism unavailable until 4 years after conviction. It is extremely difficult to control for treatment effects because of the ethical issues surrounding withholding of treatment, but cognitive techniques provide a promising treatment approach. The present study attempted to address all these issues for men with a learning disability. A cognitive treatment is presented and data are available for at least 5 years after conviction. An AB design was used and treatment effects were monitored carefully. Treatment dealt with the issues of accepting that the offense took place, taking responsibility for the offense, accepting the intention of the offending behavior, victim awareness, and behavior consistent with offending for four offenders. All the men responded to treatment, although one offender with only 1 year of probation responded less convincingly than others. Beliefs relating to indecent exposure being fun or not causing harm to women seemed most open to alteration. The beliefs in which the perpetrator thought that the victim shared responsibility for the offense and that women may take a long while to recover from such an incident, seemed the most difficult to alter. Individual characteristics of the case examples are discussed in terms of these general trends.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1998 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00010-9