Assessment & Research

The Revised Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-R): Factor Structure and Psychometric Evaluation.

Wellnitz et al. (2021) · Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research 2021
★ The Verdict

A 39-item revision of the CCC-2 keeps the power but cuts the length, giving you a fast way to spot pragmatic language issues in school-age clients.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess social-communication skills in elementary or middle-school clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with infants or with adults.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team trimmed the long Children’s Communication Checklist-2 from 70 items to 39. They kept only the questions that hang together best.

Parents of kids with autism, intellectual disability, mixed mental-health needs, and typical development filled out the new form. The researchers ran factor and reliability checks to see if the short list still worked.

02

What they found

The 39-item CCC-R held up: internal consistency was strong and it still split the clinical groups from the typical group.

Kids with autism scored highest on the pragmatic-language factor. Kids with ID stood out on grammar and word meaning.

03

How this fits with other research

Ferrara et al. (2020) had already shown the full 70-item Italian CCC-2 can flag pragmatic issues in autism. Palka Bayard de Volo et al. (2021) now shows you can get the same punch with almost half the items, saving caregiver time.

Narzisi et al. (2013) used the CBCL 1½-5 to spot toddlers who later received an ASD diagnosis. Their tool is for 18-36-month-olds; the CCC-R is for broader school-age use. Together they give you a toddler screen and a school-age language follow-up.

Lopata et al. (2020) shortened the Adapted Skillstreaming Checklist to three clean factors for social skills. Palka Bayard de Volo et al. (2021) did the same for pragmatics. Both studies prove leaner checklists can stay reliable.

04

Why it matters

You now have a 5-minute, 39-question caregiver form that reliably points to pragmatic red flags in autism, ID, or mixed clinical groups. Use it during intake, re-evaluation, or before starting social-skills training to decide where to probe deeper.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Swap in the 39-item CCC-R for your next caregiver packet and note which factor scores jump out before you plan language targets.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
839
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, mixed clinical, neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-2) is often applied to assess pragmatic language impairment which is highly prevalent in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and several mental health conditions. We replicated previous findings on the limited applicability of the CCC-2 in clinical samples and the inconsistent findings concerning the factor structure. The aim of the present study was, thus, to develop a concise, simplified, and revised version of the CCC-2 in a large German-speaking sample. Four groups of children and adolescents aged 4 to 17 years were included: ASD (n = 195), intellectual disability (ID, n = 83), diverse mental health conditions (MHC, n = 144) and a typically developing control group (TD, n = 417). We reduced the original number of items from 70 to 39, based on item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and the exclusion of communication-unrelated items. The revised version, CCC-R (α = 0.96), consists of two empirically derived factors: a pragmatic-language (α = 0.96) and a grammatical-semantic-language factor (α = 0.93). All clinical groups (ASD, ID, and MHC) had significantly increased CCC-R total scores, with the highest scores being in the neurodevelopmental disorder groups (ASD and ID). In addition, we found group-specific patterns of elevated pragmatic-language scores in the ASD group and grammatical-semantic scores in the ID group. The CCC-R was comparable to the CCC-2 in distinguishing ASD from the other groups. The CCC-R is proposed as a simplified and easily applied, clinical questionnaire for caregivers, assessing pragmatic language impairments across neurodevelopmental disorders and mental health conditions. LAY SUMMARY: The CCC-2 is a questionnaire designed to identify children who have problems in the social use of language, however, it is limited in its clinical application and exhibits inconsistent factors. We have created a shorter and simpler version of the CCC-2 that we have called the CCC-R which overcomes the previous limitations of the CCC-2. It consists of two subscales: pragmatic language and grammatical-semantic language. The CCC-R can be used as a short and clinically relevant caregiver questionnaire which assesses pragmatic language impairments in children and adolescents. Autism Res 2021, 14: 759-772. © 2021 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2021 · doi:10.1002/aur.2467