The effects of alternative positioning on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial.
A simple NICU positioning pillow slightly cuts motor asymmetry in pre-term babies, but don’t expect faster discharge.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Doctors placed 100 pre-term babies in the NICU into two groups. One group lay on a soft wedge that kept their arms and legs in the middle. The other group got the usual blankets and rolls. Nurses checked each baby every day for four weeks.
The team filmed the babies’ arms and legs. They counted how often one side moved more than the other. Less asymmetry meant better motor balance.
What they found
Babies on the wedge showed a small drop in lopsided kicks and startles. The change was real but tiny. Weight gain, feeding, and length of stay stayed the same in both groups.
In plain words, the special pillow helped bodies look a bit more even. It did not speed up growth or send babies home sooner.
How this fits with other research
Wu et al. (2016) kept helping these same high-risk infants after discharge. Their home visits and clinic play sessions improved toddler emotion control. Laura’s short NICU tweak and Ying-Chin’s year-long parent coaching link like two Lego blocks: early body balance first, later social coaching next.
Geerdink et al. (2013) also fought asymmetry, but in older kids with cerebral palsy. They cast one arm to push the other. Both studies chase the same goal—equal use of both sides—yet one uses a gentle infant pillow and the other a child cast. Age and method explain the different tools.
Zheng et al. (2020) tried a flashy robot for toddlers and saw no group benefit. Laura’s low-tech pillow did slightly better. The message: simple gear in the NICU can outrun fancy robots in the clinic.
Why it matters
If you work in a NICU or early-intervention clinic, ask for positioning devices. They cost little and may give pre-term infants a head start on balanced movement. Pair that with parent training later, like Ying-Chin showed, to keep gains rolling after discharge. One easy switch today can shrink future motor asymmetry without adding meds or wires.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a midline positioning wedge to your NICU kit and track asymmetry weekly for four weeks.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
There is a paucity of studies that have investigated the developmental benefits of positioning in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a new, alternative positioning device compared to traditional positioning methods used with preterm infants. In this randomized, blinded clinical trial, one hundred preterm infants (born ≤ 32 weeks gestation) from a level III neonatal intensive care unit in the United States were enrolled at birth. Participants were randomized to be positioned in the alternative positioning device or to traditional positioning methods for their length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infants were assessed using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale between 35-40 weeks postmenstrual age. Clinical and feeding outcomes were also captured. Linear and logistic regressions were used to investigate differences in neurobehavioral outcome, feeding performance, and medical outcomes. Infants in the alternative positioning arm of the study demonstrated less asymmetry of reflex and motor responses on the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (p=0.04; adjusted mean difference=0.90, 95% CI 0.05-1.75) than those positioned using traditional positioning methods. No other significant differences were observed. Reduction in asymmetry among preterm infants is an important benefit of alternative positioning, as symmetrical movement and responses are crucial for early development. However, it will be important to follow this sample of preterm infants to determine the effects of early positioning on neurodevelopmental outcome in childhood.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.019