Teaching topography-based and selection-based verbal behavior to developmentally disabled individuals: Some considerations.
Pick topography-based AAC first when the learner can shape signs or letters, then build spoken links with equivalence drills.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The author looked at twenty years of studies on two kinds of AAC. One kind needs finger moves only. The other needs mouth or hand shapes.
He asked which kind is easier for kids and adults who have developmental delays. He also showed how stimulus-equivalence tests can guide the pick.
What they found
Topography-based systems, like signs or writing, were learned faster in most cases. Selection-based boards took more trials to master.
The paper gives a simple rule: if the learner can form signs or letters, start there. Then use equivalence drills to link the new form to spoken words.
How this fits with other research
Delamater et al. (1986) proved the point with an autistic adult. They replaced his echolalia with correct answers by teaching him to write the words first.
Griffith et al. (2012) showed the same idea with coins. After kids felt the coins, they could name them without extra teaching. This is stimulus equivalence in action.
Wilkins et al. (2009) chained long echoic stories with kids with autism. Their mouths shaped the sounds, another win for topography-based work.
Why it matters
If your client has even small hand or mouth control, try signs, writing, or typing first. Run match-to-sample lessons so the new form links to pictures and spoken words. You may see faster gains and less prompt dependence than with picture boards alone.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Test if your client can trace three letters; if yes, start teaching those letters as requests and run picture-letter matching trials.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Augmentative and alternative communication systems are widely recommended for nonvocal developmentally disabled individuals, with selection-based systems becoming increasingly popular. However, theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that topography-based communication systems are easier to learn. This paper discusses research relevant to the ease of acquisition of topography-based and selection-based systems. Additionally, current practices for choosing and designing communication systems are reviewed in order to investigate the extent to which links have been made with available theoretical and experimental knowledge. A stimulus equivalence model is proposed as a clearer direction for practitioners to follow when planning a communication training program. Suggestions for future research are also offered.
The Analysis of verbal behavior, 1993 · doi:10.1007/BF03392892