Specific Language Impairment affects the early spelling process quantitatively but not qualitatively.
Kids with SLI learn spelling the normal way—just slower—so give them more practice, not a new method.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers watched first-graders spell made-up words on a computer. Some kids had Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Some had typical language. The team counted how many letters each child wrote and looked at the kinds of mistakes they made.
They wanted to know if SLI children spell differently, not just worse.
What they found
SLI kids made the same types of errors as their peers. They just made more of them. The pattern of mistakes looked normal—only the amount was behind.
How this fits with other research
Gilboa et al. (2014) saw the same thing in children with NF1: the writing steps looked normal, just slower. Both studies tell us to practice the same skills longer, not teach new ones.
Witt et al. (2020) adds a warning—match tasks to the child’s mental age, not birthday. When they did that, kids with ID learned new words the same way as peers. Together these papers say: keep the method, adjust the dose and difficulty.
Chang et al. (2014) looks different at first glance—they found computer handwriting drills beat sensorimotor therapy. But their kids had dysgraphia, not SLI. The target paper says SLI spelling needs more repetition; Shao-Hsia says dysgraphia handwriting needs tech help. Different problems, different fixes.
Why it matters
If you run spelling lessons for children with SLI, double the practice trials before you switch programs. Use the same phonics rules, same letter tiles, same routines—just run them longer. Check mental age when you set goals so the task is fair, not just grade-level.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add ten extra spelling trials of the same word set to your next session—same prompts, more reps.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present study investigated whether children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) need a special spelling education program, by examining whether the early spelling of children with SLI is quantitatively and qualitatively different from the spelling of typically developing children. Two groups of first grade children participated: 39 children with a typical language development between the age of 73 and 88 months, and 59 children with SLI between the age of 71 and 97 months. The results indicated that children with SLI do have a quantitative delay in both grapheme knowledge and spelling during first grade. However, there was no qualitative difference between the early spelling of children with SLI and typically developing children. This indicated that children with SLI have the same spelling processes as typically developing children, although they develop slower. For clinical practice, this means that teachers of children with SLI can practice the same skills as with typically developing children, but they have to practice substantially more than typically developing children.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.011