Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication.
Kids with 16p11.2 copy-number changes show autism-level sensory challenges—screen and plan for sensory supports early.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Smith et al. (2022) asked parents of 69 children with 16p11.2 deletions or duplications to fill out the Sensory Profile. The team wanted to see how these kids process sights, sounds, touch, and movement.
Most children in the sample had autism-level sensory scores. Over 70 % showed "registration deficits" — they missed or took too long to notice everyday sensory input.
What they found
Parents reported high rates of sensory sensitivity and avoidance. Kids pulled away from loud noises, refused certain textures, or became overwhelmed in busy places.
The pattern looked like the sensory issues you see in autism, even when an autism diagnosis was not yet made.
How this fits with other research
de Leeuw et al. (2024) studied the same 16p11.2 group and found big social-communicative and behavior problems. Together the two papers paint a full picture: sensory issues sit beside language and behavior challenges in these kids.
Soliman et al. (2025) added motor data. Children with the same gene change also scored low on gross and fine motor tests. Sensory, social, and motor domains all need attention.
Barton et al. (2019) showed that sensory hypersensitivity drives repetitive behaviors in both autistic and non-autistic kids. Harriet’s sensory findings hint that tackling sensory input first may cut down repetitive play or movements in 16p11.2 clients too.
Why it matters
If you work with a child who has a 16p11.2 deletion or duplication, run a full sensory screen even before autism signs solidify. Use the Sensory Profile or similar checklist. Add motor and sleep screens (Priscilla et al., 2025; Dana et al., 2023) to build a complete support plan. Early sensory supports — noise-reducing headphones, visual schedules, movement breaks — can lower overload and may reduce later repetitive or escape behaviors.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a Sensory Profile to your intake packet for any client with a 16p11.2 note and trial one sensory break each session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory processing is affected has not yet been considered in detail. Parents/caregivers of 38 children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 31 children with a 16p11.2 duplication completed the Sensory Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the Child Sensory Profile 2 (CSP-2) along with other standardized questionnaires assessing autistic traits (SRS-2), ADHD traits (Conners 3), anxiety (SCAS-P) and adaptive behavior (VABS-3). SBQ and CSP-2 responses found that sensory processing differences were clearly evident in both 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication, though there was significant variation in both cohorts. SBQ data indicated the frequency and impact of sensory behavior were more severe when compared to neurotypical children, with levels being similar to autistic children. CSP-2 data indicated over 70% of children displayed clear differences in sensory registration (missing sensory input). Seventy-one percent with 16p11.2 duplications were also unusually sensitive to sensory information and 57% with 16p11.2 duplications were unusually avoidant of sensory stimuli. This first detailed assessment of sensory processing, alongside other clinical features, in relatively large cohorts of children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication demonstrates that sensory processing differences have a profound impact on their lives.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2022 · doi:10.1002/aur.1465.16p11.2